I am only a junior member so doubt my vote counts for much...
The creationist side is a bit thin. It is sometimes hard not to dogpile.
I have read a fair few of his posts and I believe he would be more valuable to the creationist side that DB and IMJ.
Jar mentioned the non member readers. At this moment there are 193 visitors here. It would be a sad waste of those readers time if they were reading one of the posts I have been involved in where I am trying to explain what the word 'nature' means to IMJ or the word 'communicate' to DB. At least with Buz, there is meat to the actual discussion. The other readers may actually see a debate worth reading. They should be able to see if one side has not provided sufficient evidence or not. Particularly when his opponents point the fact out.
I pinched this from one of the other thread advising of why Buz was restrained, I am pretty sure it was from Admin but I have closed the window -
quote:Buz lost his permissions in the science forums because of his views about what constitutes valid evidence differs from that of science. That means he can no longer discuss science topics related to the creation/evolution debate at this site, at least not until he is able to reach a consensus with other members here about the nature of scientific evidence.
If Buz shows that he is incapable of doing this, then he would have blown his last chance.
I say let him back in.
I could agree with you, but then we would both be wrong
Butterfly, AKA, mallethead - Dawn Bertot
"Superstitions and nonsense from the past should not prevent us from making progress. If we hold ourselves back, we admit that our fears are more powerful than our abilities." Hunters of Dune Herbert & Anderson