Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 55 (9054 total)
101 online now:
dwise1, PaulK (2 members, 99 visitors)
Newest Member: EWolf
Post Volume: Total: 888,178 Year: 5,824/14,102 Month: 410/335 Week: 16/83 Day: 0/16 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Languages and the Creationist account.
Jon
Inactive Member


(1)
Message 8 of 32 (633197)
09-13-2011 12:22 AM
Reply to: Message 7 by Dr Adequate
09-12-2011 6:31 PM


I have trouble finding much distinction between the Creationist crazies that try to trace all modern languages to a common ancestral tongue and the pseudo-science cranks who attempt the exact same thing.

They generally have different goals in mind, but they are really the same kind of stupid.


Love your enemies!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by Dr Adequate, posted 09-12-2011 6:31 PM Dr Adequate has not yet responded

  
Jon
Inactive Member


Message 14 of 32 (633934)
09-17-2011 9:48 AM
Reply to: Message 12 by Portillo
09-17-2011 12:56 AM


Evidence of What?
I'm not sure I see how this is related.

How does this address the issue of the dates for PIE alone being incompatible with the Genesis YEC account? How does this address the issue that there is not a shred of evidence suggesting there was ever a single world language, most especially any time within even a few thousand years of the YEC creation?

Jon


Love your enemies!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by Portillo, posted 09-17-2011 12:56 AM Portillo has not yet responded

  
Jon
Inactive Member


Message 19 of 32 (634114)
09-19-2011 10:48 AM
Reply to: Message 18 by caffeine
09-19-2011 4:55 AM


This suggests the potential for language was already there, but never expressed until after spreading across the globe.

This is a little problematic: in all known instances where the 'potential for language' is present, language develops.

If there was not a single 'proto-World' language, then we must assume that the potential for language developed after ancient humans had become too dispersed to share a language.

To think, then, that any trace of connection would remain between two languages seperated by tens of thousands of years, mostly spoken by small, close-knit societies with minimal contact with outsiders and no written language, is absurd.

And we may not even know what languages so old would have looked like. Did they utilize similar syllable structuring? The common three-part consonant distinctions? And this is even more true when we start going back so far that we are no longer agreeably dealing with homo sapiens, but instead different human varieties with different brains and different vocal structures. If such critters beget modern humans and their full capacity and potential for language, then the obvious question is: did they possess linguistic abilities? And if so, what was the nature of their 'languages'?

The question of language origins requires us to consider matters of human evolution, and once we do this the Biblical account is clearly sunk. (As if it weren't clearly enough sunk before hand.)

Jon


Love your enemies!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by caffeine, posted 09-19-2011 4:55 AM caffeine has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2021