|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,415 Year: 3,672/9,624 Month: 543/974 Week: 156/276 Day: 30/23 Hour: 3/3 |
Thread ▼ Details |
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Importance of Original Sin | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANT Member Posts: 6769 From: SSC Joined: Member Rating: 1.6 |
Hi Jay,
Just a couple of quick questions. How many places could the physical man Jesus be in at once? If the physical man Jesus is in us why did he say:
quote: quote: What was Jesus talking about in this statement?
quote: Why did Paul make this statement:
quote: Why did Jesus tell Nicodemus:
quote: It seems to me the Spirit of God is the one who indwells mankind sealing his spirit until the day of redemption, and leading us in all truth. The problem is most people that claim to be a christian does not have the Spirit of God indwelling in them. Now my two cents on original sin. There is no discussion of original sin in the Bible. The man formed from the dust of the ground in Genesis 2:7 that God breathed the breath of life into was a perfect man without sin. He alone was commanded not to eat of the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. He was told the day he ate of that fruit he would die. The woman was deceived and she ate the fruit. Her eyes were not opened at that time. She then gave to her husband and he chose to eat the fruit, he was not deceived. After the man ate the forbiden fruittheir eyes were opened and they realized they were naked. The only way you can come up with the term original sin is that this was the first sin that was ever comitted by mankind. Up until this time God walked with mankind and talked with them. From the time God sent them out of the Garden man was separated from God because of that first sin. According to Paul that initial separation caused the separation of all mankind that followed and all are under the penalty of death. Someone has said there was death before this man was formed from the dust of the ground. According to Genesis 2:5 there was no living life form that existed before the man formed in Genesis 2:7. That being the case death did not exist until this man disobeyed God and chose to eat of the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. God Bless,"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANT Member Posts: 6769 From: SSC Joined: Member Rating: 1.6 |
Hi hooah,
hooah writes: Now there's sin. All because of the eating of an apple. Where in the story found in Genesis chapter 3 does it mention an apple?
hooah writes: How can you preced this by saying there is no discussion of original sin? Where in Genesis chapter 2 and 3 does it mention eating the fruit to be a sin?
quote: The man was simply given a rule not to eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. God said nothing about sin, just disobedience. The man was told that if he ate of the fruit of the knowledge of good and evil he would die. That was the consequences for not obeying God. As you know I believe the man died the same day he ate the fruit.
hooah writes: I will add that this is precisely the thinking I had coming into this topic: makind was created without sin. The man formed from the dust of the ground that God breathed the breath of life into was perfect, yet he had the ability to disobey God's command by his own freewill. That was the purpose of the tree and it makes no difference what kind of tree it was as it was the one God specified.
hooah writes: Then, sin was introduced after they ate the apple. If that tiny event didn't occur, we would have no need for the jesus character. And that man and woman would still be in the Garden walking and talking with God and you and I would have never existed. Disobedience was introduced. We have been conditioned to call disobedience sin. But disobedience to God is just disobedience to God regardless of what we call it. Since we are under the New Testament of Jesus Christ so called by His disciples who could not understand that He was God in human flesh. God came down to the Earth and was hung on a cross where He willing gave His life so mankind could be restored to the position the man He formed from the dust of the ground occupied in the Garden. That man could walk and talk with God in right relationship.
quote: These verses tell us that the Son of man must be crucified that mankind would not perish if he believed in Him. Verse 16 gives the reason that death had to occure which was God's love for His creation. Verse 17 tells us that God the Son did not come to condemn the world. Mankind was condemned already. Verse 18 tells us mankind is condemned because he has not believed in the only begotten Son of God. So nobody has to do anything in order to spend eternity in the lake of fire that was prepared for the devil and his angels. That is a fact unless mankind will receive the free full pardon offered by God of eternal life with Him. Mankind has a choice that they can exercise their freewill and obey God and live with Him forever or they can say no to His offer. The consequences of not accepting God's offer is eternal separation from God. God Bless, "John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANT Member Posts: 6769 From: SSC Joined: Member Rating: 1.6
|
Hi PD,
purpledawn writes: From a Biblical standpoint, the doctrine of Original Sin isn't necessary. Good way to lay a guilt trip on people, but not really necessary for belief. Can you point to any verse in the Bible that says mankind is condemned for their sins? John recorded a conversation Jesus had with Nicodemus in chapter 3 where He tells Nicodemus he had to be born of the spirit to see the kingdom of heaven. Jesus in this conversation tell Nicodemus that mankind is condemned already. He did not say mankind was condemned because of sins (bad things he had done). Jesus did say:
quote: So mankind is not condemned because of his sins. Jesus said mankind was condemned because of unbelief. Jesus did not say mankind was condemned because of their behavior. God Bless,"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANT Member Posts: 6769 From: SSC Joined: Member Rating: 1.6 |
Hi Jay,
jaywill writes: . Using my imagination, perhaps if Adam had not sinned we would be in a Paradise talking about our great father Adam. Your imagination took a wrong turn. If the man formed from the dust of the ground in Genesis 2:7 had not chosen to willfully disobey God and eat the fruit if the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you would never have existed. Had that man not eaten of the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil he would still be living in the garden walking and talking with God. He would not have been chased out of the garden and there would have been no guard placed to protect the tree of life from the man who had been separated from God by his disobedience. Man had to be reconciled to a right relationship with God. Thus a redeemer was required.
jaywill writes: The comparison of Adam to Christ is crucial to a proper view of the purpose of God. The first man had a right relationship with God but chose to disobey God and become separated from God in an unright relationship. God in a form we call Jesus came to repair that relationship. He gave His life so mankind could be restored to a right relationship to God. His only requirement is that we accept the gift of eternal life with Him which He has offered to all mankind. Mankind can choose to accept that gift or they can refuse to accept the gift it is their choice. God Bless,"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANT Member Posts: 6769 From: SSC Joined: Member Rating: 1.6 |
Hi jar,
jar writes: In you example the god you are marketing may well think that Adam and Eve disobeyed him but until they had the capability to know right from wrong god was of no higher standing than the serpent. They had every reason to "obey" the serpent. There simply was no way they could choose or even understand obey or disobey. Both were simply null concepts.
Where does the text say anything about knowing right from wrong? God Bless,"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANT Member Posts: 6769 From: SSC Joined: Member Rating: 1.6 |
Hi CS,
Catholic Scientist writes: A talking snake and magic fruit!? C'mon, it smacks of "fairytale". You never saw the show Francis the talking mule, or Mr Ed the talking horse. You have never seen a dummy sitting on a man's knee talking. What problem would the devil have in speaking through a snake? As far as the magic fruit there was no magic about it. It could have been any kind of fruit. The tree was simpily the one God specifically told the man he was not to eat from, because if he did he would die.
Catholic Scientist writes: Too, Humans did not descend from one single pair of people. No people alive on Earth today descended from the man formed from the dust of the Ground in Genesis 2:7. All mankind living today are descended from the mankind that was created male and female in Genesis 1:27. Which says nothing about how many mankind male or female was created in Genesis 1:27. God Bless,"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANT Member Posts: 6769 From: SSC Joined: Member Rating: 1.6 |
Hi Straggler,
Straggler writes: What are you getting at ICANT? I was simply asking a theological question.
quote: Nowhere in the text does it say anything about knowing right from wrong. The man was forbiden from eating the fruit from a specific tree, in fact he was told the day he ate that fruit he would die. Nothing said about knowing whether it was right or wrong just a commandment not to eat the fruit from the tree.
quote: This is what the text says. This is what I understand jar to say the text says: Modified Genesis 2:17 But of the tree of the knowledge of right and wrong, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die. Thus implying the man did not know right from wrong and thus was not guilty of disobeying God. It makes no difference whether the man knew right from wrong he did know he was commanded not to eat the fruit of the specified tree. God Bless,"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANT Member Posts: 6769 From: SSC Joined: Member Rating: 1.6 |
Hi CS,
Catholic Scientist writes: "So it was written" as opposed to "So it was" leaves open the possibility that he was talking about a story that wasn't necessarily factual events. Paul did not write "So it was written". Paul wrote:καί οϋτω(ς) γράφω The first word is kai a conjunction connecting this sentence to the previous sentence. The second word is hout(s) an adverb meaning in this manner. The third word is graph a verb which means to write or written. So Paul said, "And, in this manner written". "So" was a choice of the translators as was the insertion of "it is". God Bless,"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANT Member Posts: 6769 From: SSC Joined: Member Rating: 1.6 |
Hi NoNukes,
NoNukes writes: After his deception of Eve, God curses the serpent. I don't see any indication in Genesis that an evil being was using ventriloquism or fakery to make the serpent appear to talk. Well if the serpent was not being spoken through by the devil who was he being controled by? Serpents can't talk can they? Yet this one did talk. But in this paradise perfect world all the animals might have been able to speak. Those of us who make it to the New Jerusalem John wrote about in Revelation will find out won't we. You do know the devil is refered to many times in the Bible as a serpent don't you?
NoNukes writes: It could have been, but eating the fruit appeared to have magical effects on Adam and Eve. What magical effects? The only thing that happened was when the man not the woman ate the fruit their eyes were opened and they saw they were naked. What was magical about them knowing they were naked? They did decide they needed clothes and covered themselves with fig leaves. Which is a lot more material than some try to cover their nakedness with today. God Bless,"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANT Member Posts: 6769 From: SSC Joined: Member Rating: 1.6 |
Hi Straggler,
Straggler writes: On what basis should he be expected to obey rather than disobey God? If it is possible for you to put yourself in the first mans place please do so and lets look at what he observed. The man was formed from the dust of the ground in Genesis 2:7:
quote: This man was the first living life form on the face of the Earth.
quote: There was no plants of anykind alive so there was no animals of anykind alive. So the man of Genesis 2:7 was looking at a barren Earth. Now lets see what he observed, besides a barren Earth that had no water, no plants, and no animals.
quote: So this man observed plants that came into existence after he did.
quote: He then observed trees to grow out of the ground.
quote: He saw a river begin to exist.
quote: He saw animals, and fowls that began to exist.
quote: God brought a woman to him and he knew she was cloned from a bone from his body. Now if you saw all these things and the being that you saw do them told you not to eat the fruit of a specific tree, would you disobey that being? The man formed from the dust of the ground in Genesis 2:7 had every right to believe that God could and would do exactly what He said He would do if he ate the fruit from the forbiden tree. Now if you want to mix this story up with the story in Genesis 1:2 throught Genesis 2:3 in which the man was created in the image/likeness of God on day six which was not told he could not eat of a specific tree, you could come to the conclusion why should I obey? God Bless,"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANT Member Posts: 6769 From: SSC Joined: Member Rating: 1.6 |
Hi iano,
iano writes: Not unless I was given cause to be swayed in another direction. What cause was given to the first man to disobey and eat the fruit? He knew the consequences was death. God Bless,"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANT Member Posts: 6769 From: SSC Joined: Member Rating: 1.6 |
Hi PD,
purpledawn writes: You're adding to the story. I am not adding to anything. I simply gave what was recorded in the verses I presented. Either it is true or it is false you have the choice of exercising your freewill and accept what is written or reject it. God Bless, "John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANT Member Posts: 6769 From: SSC Joined: Member Rating: 1.6 |
Hi iano,
iano writes: Satan is offering Adam that he can be like God afterall. Where did Satan or the serpent make that offer to the man? God Bless,"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANT Member Posts: 6769 From: SSC Joined: Member Rating: 1.6 |
Hi Straggler,
Straggler writes: Pardon my biblical ignorance but what exactly did He say that he would do? Cause the consequences of disobedience to occure. The consequences for disobedience was death. God Bless,"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANT Member Posts: 6769 From: SSC Joined: Member Rating: 1.6 |
Hi iano,
iano writes: Here..
quote: I don't see where that says the serpent said unto the man. I can't find anywhere the serpent talked to the man. I can find where the man blamed God and the woman for the problem as he said:
quote: God said to the man:
quote: So the man listened to his wife not the serpent. If you pay close attention to the text of 3:6,7 you will notice the womans eyes were not opened when she ate the fruit. Their eyes was open after the man disobeyed God and ate the fruit. God Bless,"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024