I think you are correct but I can not keep all of Kant's thought in my head at any one time yet.
The art of designing life and its creation independent of man's capability are two different things.If there need be no necessary coexistence of a design and it's designer then I can see how ID without IC might not be useful in any future development of evolutionary theory however if there is God and baramins seperately created such that void(s) exists where the community of biologists assumes a continuum no matter how large its magnitude the only problem with demonstrative ID detection is whether one is knowing the architect or creator. Knowing the creator is just as much a problem for religion as it is not for science but biologists who think they can "evolve" morals imply some kind of coexistence (between creatures) such that they unawares support what in general they do not. It seems the fault of evolutionists cleaning their eugenic hands that they have failed to return biology to its extension with man and thus have lost the architect's art which the creation of molecular biology continues to strain the fabric of its economic reality and causes thus disruptions in the education of its students.
This message has been edited by Brad McFall, 05-11-2005 08:33 AM
™ Version 4.2