ICANT writes:
Scientist and others say Science says there was no global flood.
But without knowing the geography of the Earth at the time of the flood no conclusion can be reached.
Wrong. I don't need to know how someone was murdered to find evidence of it happening - so why would a global flood be any different?
ICANT writes:
So which piece of information was taken out of context.
If you click on the links at the bottom of this post you can follow the conversation backwards and read what you have written.
Personally, I prefer to remember what I have said and what I am discussing.
But to help you with your poor memory: "The problem is that Science tells us the land mass was all in one place at one time, as the Bible tells us there was one land mass at one time."
This is particularly ironic since your avatar shows that there is no need for there to be one land mass.
ICANT writes:
But that water was added to my avatar today so I could ask the question, "is all the water in my avatar in the same place"?
So thanks for confirming that the water in my avatar is not all in one place.
But you have forgotten what you are talking about again.
Here it is for you:
Panda writes:
ICANT writes:
But if all the land was in one place at one time that would leave all the water in one place.
No. Look at your avatar: all the land is in one place - but the water is not. QED.
So - no.
The fact that the water in your avatar is not 'all in one place' while the land clearly is 'all in one place' disproves your claim.
Your own evidence has proved you wrong.
ICANT writes:
I have presented what the KJV Bible say about the events I have described so far as well as the confirmation that Science has given in the past to the land mass being in one place at one time requiring all the water to be in one place at one time.
And if we keep stumbling around on determining the geography of the Earth at the time of the Noah flood we will never get to any specific details about the flood.
If we do not know what the Earth was like when the flood took place there is no way of determining what happened.
The science doesn't agree with you.
So, if you don't feel there is enough evidence in the bible to know what happened, then I suggest that you stop making unsupported claims.
ICANT writes:
Once it is determined what the geography was when the flood took place then we can discuss any information Biblical or Scientific as to whether the flood took place or not.
But to say Science disproves the flood without knowing what the Earth's geography was at the time of the flood is asinine.
And I repeat: when something happens in the past: it leaves evidence.
Your mantra of "We need to know the geography before we can know if it happened" is not an argument that has any merit.
It is patently wrong.
ICANT writes:
Does that say all the water under heaven was gathered to one place?
Does it say that the land was all in one place?
No.
ICANT writes:
So this is not what ICANT imagines the text says but exactly what the text says.
Since it doesn't say that all the land was in one place, then it must have been imagined by you.
ICANT writes:
If everyone here wants to declare that the Earth was just like it is today then there is no way to have a discussion.
Have you decided on when it happened yet?
4500 years ago?
250 million years ago?
Edited by Panda, : No reason given.
Edited by Panda, : tweaks for clarity
If I were you
And I wish that I were you
All the things I'd do
To make myself turn blue
™ Version 4.2
