Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9031 total)
73 online now:
AZPaul3, dwise1, Tanypteryx (3 members, 70 visitors)
Newest Member: robertleva
Post Volume: Total: 884,899 Year: 2,545/14,102 Month: 210/703 Week: 31/158 Day: 31/10 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Where Did The (Great Flood) Water Come From And Where Did It Go?
Admin
Director
Posts: 12716
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002


Message 2 of 432 (642538)
11-29-2011 7:29 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Trixie
11-29-2011 5:09 AM


Assuming you would like evidence for where the water came from and where it went, I don't think this would be off-topic for the Evidence for a recent flood thread.

Edited by Admin, : Remove sig.


--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Trixie, posted 11-29-2011 5:09 AM Trixie has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by Trixie, posted 11-29-2011 9:45 AM Admin has acknowledged this reply

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 12716
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002


Message 4 of 432 (642541)
11-29-2011 4:32 PM


Thread Copied from Proposed New Topics Forum
Thread copied here from the Where did the water come from and where did it go? thread in the Proposed New Topics forum.

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 12716
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002


Message 34 of 432 (642950)
12-02-2011 10:15 PM
Reply to: Message 31 by Coyote
12-02-2011 9:10 PM


Re: Catastrophic (for creationists)
Hi Coyote,

In this thread Trixie is looking for consistency with the laws of science rather than evidence.


--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by Coyote, posted 12-02-2011 9:10 PM Coyote has acknowledged this reply

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 12716
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002


Message 36 of 432 (642953)
12-02-2011 10:29 PM
Reply to: Message 35 by ICANT
12-02-2011 10:22 PM


Re: Catastrophic (for creationists)
Hi ICANT,

Trixie is not asking for evidence. She's asking for clear descriptions of where the water came from and where it went, then she'd like to examine the offered scenarios for their compatibility with known science, in other words, whether they're scientifically feasible.

Edited by Admin, : Grammar.


--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by ICANT, posted 12-02-2011 10:22 PM ICANT has not yet responded

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 12716
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002


(1)
Message 54 of 432 (643012)
12-03-2011 9:17 PM
Reply to: Message 51 by ICANT
12-03-2011 6:49 PM


Re: It's your model!
Hi ICANT,

You're working very hard at being paranoid.

This thread is asking creationists to describe their model of where the water came from and where it went. In this thread it doesn't matter how the Bible is interpreted to arrive at the model. No one will dispute any Biblical interpretation because this thread was not intended to discuss Biblical interpretations. That's all that Trixie meant when she said, "This isn't a topic for arguing what the text says." Its for discussing the model from a scientific perspective. How the Bible was interpreted to arrive at the model doesn't matter.

So if you want to discuss how the Bible was interpreted in order to determine where the water came from and where it went, then this is the wrong thread. That would be a topic for a different thread.

All this thread is asking is for creationists to describe their model so that it can be examined and discussed from a scientific perspective.


--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by ICANT, posted 12-03-2011 6:49 PM ICANT has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 59 by Trixie, posted 12-04-2011 5:47 AM Admin has acknowledged this reply

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2021