Good morning Zen Deist,
A church can have their own celebration, but they cannot say what a US state (or other US) government celebration has to be or what it is called.
I agree, the church should not dictate to the state what the state must call a particular holiday celebration. Especially at the expense of excluding others who celebrate the season for different reasons. The residents of the state however should be able to express their desire to what the state does.
Thus when a state government advertises and has a "Holiday Tree Lighting Ceremony" this is respectful of ALL faiths, beliefs, traditions, celebrations and cultures ... covering a period of time spanning the dates of many celebrations
I understand that the state wants to be p.c. (Not really my strong point by the way. I hate being p.c.) but how many other holiday traditions involve tree lighting? I ask out of ignorance actually. I just believe that you should call something what it is. If you are performing a tree lighting and none of the other cultures or traditions involve the lighting of a tree. Then why bother being p.c. about the name? You are already excluding these other cultures by performing a ceremony that is traditionally involved with Christmas.
'Qui non intelligit, aut taceat, aut discat'
The mind is like a parachute. It only works when it is open.-FZ
The industrial revolution, flipped a bitch on evolution.-NOFX
Opening your mind to imagination shouldn't close it to reality.
It takes all kinds to make a mess- Benjamin Hoff