How did the Aborigines get to Australia?

Opps. Nice rebuttle. Insults as usual. Doesn't cut it Doc. You really are sloppy here. Stick to the political threads.

It's pretty simple. After the flood the continents split and whatever animals where on certain continents ended up there. Easy.Evolutionist can't buy that but can buy everything poofed into existance by accident accompanied by chance and evolved into the miraculous life we see today, but can't buy this.It's a mystery the things they can buy.

I think it's a pretty good model. Of course you don't have to agree with it. I find many things evolution teaches silly too. We have a different opinion on how these dates are calculated.Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.

If it's possible why is it not an acceptable alternative? Of course I have no evidence for land bridges 5000 yrs ago but it's not such a terrible stretch considering what damage the flood caused and the aftermath of it all.Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.

Why? Why did they disperse you mean?How? They walked...and humans could have played a part also. I believe humans are no more than 6000 yrs old.Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.

Yeah, the land bridges could have been in tact long enough for the trek and some time after. What do you mean? There is a good hypothesis that at one time there was one land mass connecting all land. After the flood the land mass split and now we have different continents. It didn't happen all at once. It took time. What evidence are you specifically asking for...pictures?Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.

Yes...tho they could have been there prior to the flood also about 6000 yrs ago.Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.

Why could they not have lived there before the flood? And then went back after? How is this changing my story?It's not important. I just said they could have. They might never have been there prior to the flood but they could have.Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.

If you don't want a discussion don't respond to my posts. It's simple enough. You certainly are free not to engage with me and leave it be. I'm not calling everyone silly and claiming victory, i'm adding my Creationist view point to the discussion.Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.

Talk to yourself instead. I'll talk to the one's who don't twist my views.There is absolutly no difference if they lived there before the flood or not, all I said is that it was possible.And yes dude, I am well aware the flood killed all living things that weren't on the Ark.The marsupials that were on the Ark could have went back or went there for the first time. It was not a continent then and could have been very different. They could of had a sense to go back if they were around that area before everything split. It doesn't change anything or is not even important. It was a little side note. Why you are so foucsed on is a mystery.Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.

Okay, see ya. See what this kind of nonsense causes? Posts like these ones with no content. Try to discuss the content instead of drifting into personal bias and attack. It makes for better conversation for the everyone.I know, you can't help it. You find it silly to lower yourself to debate Cteationists and cant do it without grandstanding for the audiance. No problem. Don't debate then anymore. Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.

So what? They're slow and? Do you think it was a race to get there? I'm going to take a wild stab at this one and say...the same way they outrun them now? The same way Salmon outrun the Grizzlies?Need more examples of prey outrunning their attackers? How in the world are they even still alive? I mean you would think now that their all in one area it would be easier to wipe them off the face of the earth. Instead you are asking me how they survived in a wide open land mass slowly deteriorating?

There were limited predators after the flood. There were limited marsupials also. It's a good possibility they could have survived. Plus all the fish that were on land after the flood could have kept them (the carnivores) busy enough for the sloths to safley make the journey.

With mainstream science evidence? No, I can't. It's a hypothesis among Creationists.

Wrong concerning who? We have sources that say different. Maybe it is you who are wrong? Hmmmmm...