Well of course not because that negates having actual freedom and liberties protected by laws. Anarchy is the antithesis of that. It's lawlessness, therefore no laws will be in effect to protect your rights, freedoms and liberties.
No, Onifre. Laws can never, ever ensure more freedom than you have without them. Laws are, by their nature,
restrictions. Laws that "protect" freedoms only restrict the possible actions of government, which is irrelevant in an anarchy.
Laws against theft eliminate my liberty to take possession of what you own. Laws against assault restrict my freedom to punch you in the face.
Yes. To better living.
How do you measure better vs. worse living? How do freedoms and liberties automatically translate to better living?
The human understanding when it has once adopted an opinion (either as being the received opinion or as being agreeable to itself) draws all things else to support and agree with it.
- Francis Bacon
"There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs." - John Rogers
™ Version 4.2
