I would love to have been playing this one already. They're just taking way too long and I'm starting to loose interest. SWTOR has me hooked, so without enough time to play as many games as I'd like to, Star Wars will prolly end up winning.
D2 is the game ive played the most and i love D1. I wont be playing D3 though, Francis explains why:
The video is entertaining, but his message is true.
Well, that rant was the most exercise that fat bastard got all year, I reckon.
Nice picture of Leia, though.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer. -Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong.
Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
How can the people who care for him let him (and his lard arse brother) get that big?
I'm a bit drunk right now (I don't go back to work till 9th Jan) and can't help but laugh at the fat fuck but really, it's pretty shameful.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer. -Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong.
Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
Hi NWR. It's great to have your squirrel avatar back. It reminds me of the years when your responses seemed a tad less caustic toward debate counterparts.
Could it be that as you age you're trending towards crankiness?
BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW. The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.
Someone wisely said something ;ike, "Before fooling with a fool, make sure the fool is a fool."
How can the people who care for him let him (and his lard arse brother) get that big? I'm a bit drunk right now (I don't go back to work till 9th Jan) and can't help but laugh at the fat fuck but really, it's pretty shameful.
This thing about "I'm drunk" may be nothing but an excuse to post anything or everything, on occasion, some of which otherwise might get one a moderated suspension; you know, some kind of a disclaimer?
The "particular type of people" happen to be the type of people who are concerned about truth and have developed pretty good abilities at determining what is truth. I'm not concerned with your religion. It is within your rights to observe whatever religion you wish. But you ought to be able to recognize when stories are obviously made up. You might still choose to believe such stories on the basis of faith. But it is wrong for you to accuse others of not valuing truth just because they do not choose to accept obviously made up stories.
LoL. Truth & logic, coupled with what is observed in the real observable world, indicative of intelligent design, trump what is relative, unobservable assumed and quatitively theorized.
BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW. The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.
Someone wisely said something ;ike, "Before fooling with a fool, make sure the fool is a fool."
LoL. Truth & logic, coupled with what is observed in the real observable world, indicative of intelligent design, trump what is relative, unobservable assumed and quatitively theorized.
I can only assume that at some point the English language must have slept with your wife and run over your dog. Nothing else could explain your repeated and vicious assaults on it.
Possibly: but the lad is a fat bastard who should be ashamed of himself.
This I declare.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer. -Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong.
Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
This thing about "I'm drunk" may be nothing but an excuse to post anything or everything, on occasion, some of which otherwise might get one a moderated suspension; you know, some kind of a disclaimer?
Never worked for me.
"If you can keep your head while those around you are losing theirs, you can collect a lot of heads."
How can the people who care for him let him (and his lard arse brother) get that big?
There's no evidence that weight is a proxy for health. Of course, facing the facts would just get in the way of simplistic, moralizing shaming of the fatties, right Larni?
And how about you, dude? You picked up quite a few Resident Evil 5 cheevos over the holidays, looks like. Time to put the controller down and burn off some of the figgy pudding (or whatever the fuck you eat for Christmas over there.)
General Wesley Clarke says that there is an ultimatum time arriving, and that we (and Israel) may likely significantly damage some of Irans capability to wage war. Since we do not propose to occupy them, such a war will be affordable. If they got any ideas at counterattack, a US carrier, for example, such a war could well escalate to a limited nuclear exchange if necessary. I doubt whether they would be so foolish as to challenge us.
The prospect of a nuclear Iran is simply unacceptable to us, be we morally and ethically right or not.
™ Version 4.2
(1)