Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,872 Year: 4,129/9,624 Month: 1,000/974 Week: 327/286 Day: 48/40 Hour: 2/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Modern Civics
Modulous
Member
Posts: 7801
From: Manchester, UK
Joined: 05-01-2005


Message 69 of 236 (647473)
01-09-2012 6:47 PM
Reply to: Message 58 by crashfrog
01-09-2012 4:59 PM


Re: Rights of a Citizen
Er, well, technically it does, but it does so in the same way that the Lily Ledbetter Act does - by not being a law against unlimited detention of anyone suspected of being a terrorist.
The NDAA you're referring to is not, actually, a law allowing Obama to detain anyone he wants.
Maybe the NDAA deserves its own thread, but I thought the wording says that anyone thought to have committed a 'belligerent act' can be detained 'without trial, until the end of the hostilities authorized by the [AUMF]'
Obama said
quote:
"I want to clarify that my administration will not authorize the indefinite military detention without trial of American citizens,"
Which seems to imply that Obama believes the law will give the power to do so, but he will choose not to exercise that power. Which means that other administrations in principle could choose to do so.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by crashfrog, posted 01-09-2012 4:59 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024