marc9000 writes:
quote:
Another question would be if the scientific community has made any advances concerning the origins of life which would render the Dover decision right.
Huh? I thought we were talking about evolution. Evolution doesn't have anything to say about the origin of life and is compatible with any method you care to name. Life could have arisen chemically through abiogensis, supernaturally through god zap-poofing it into existence, extraterrestrially through panspermia or alien seeding, interdimensionally through a rift in space-time, so long as that life did not replicate perfectly from generation to generation, then evolution is satisfied.
Rrhain
Thank you for your submission to Science. Your paper was reviewed by a jury of seventh graders so that they could look for balance and to allow them to make up their own minds. We are sorry to say that they found your paper "bogus," specifically describing the section on the laboratory work "boring." We regret that we will be unable to publish your work at this time.
Minds are like parachutes. Just because you've lost yours doesn't mean you can use mine.
™ Version 4.2
