quote:
:Abraham believed God's promise and was rewarded with a right standing before God, or, as Paul calls it, "righteousness." In Paul's view, this promise was fulfilled in Jesus
Yes, it was. But what does that have to do with God despising Israel?
quote:
aul came to believe that a person could not be put into a right standing before God by keeping the Law; only faith in Christ could do this.
Well, that's not entirely accurate. The Law is only the shadow of the real thing. Its like this: Suppose your on the side of the road, and a big semi-truck is barreling towards you. Which would you rather have happen to you-- the truck hitting you, or its shadow rolling over you?
The "truck" of judgment rolled over Jesus Christ, while the shadow remains as a reminder that the truck is there for a reason. Because if you don't accept the shadow, then full truck of judgment will be upon you. Those who reject Christ must live in full accordance to the Law of God. And since no one has been able to do that, no, not even one, then perdition awaits those who mock at it.
But aside from this, I'm having a hard time understanding how any of this correlates to your claim that God hates the Jews.
I am not implying that Paul hated any of these Jews, or anyone, for that matter, only to point out that he was quite clear that the old Jewish way of salvation through the Law was pointless.
It wasn't pointless then, and it isn't pointless now. Funny that I was just listening to a sermon on this discussion just the other day.
"There was something the Law could not do. The Law was like a mirror. You look at the mirror and it tells you your face is dirty. But you don't go to the mirror to wash your face. It won't take that dirt off-- you'll only rub it in more. And what God is saying is: I gave you the Law and your identity... but one thing the Law could not do is change your consciences-- what you wanted to do.
For you see, if we could get to God by the keeping of the Law, it would produce exactly the opposite of what He was trying to teach us. Rather than faith, it would take us to works. Rather than humility, it would take us to pride. Rather than take us to spirituality, it would take us to externals." -
Ravi Zacharias
He also discouraged Gentiles from following the Law as a means to salvation, since if through the Law they could gain salvation, then Jesus' death was pointless; for Paul, Christ was the only way.
Yes, Paul believed that the Halacha was not to be placed on gentiles as a burden, since Jesus is the fulfillment of the Law. Jesus isn't in the stead of the Law, rather, He is the Law.
What does Jesus have to do with Christianity?
Hmmmmmmm, you mean beside everything?
Paul made a distinction. Paul blamed the Jews. Paul took responsibility for his acts as a Jew.
Paul didn't blame Jews. He blamed the legalists for their lack of faith and understanding, just as Jesus did.
Paul claimed he was forgiven by converting to Christ. Unfortunately, there was no forgiveness for the Jews still following the old ways, the ones who had yet to put faith in Christ.
First of all, salvation is an individual choice. Many Jews have turned to Jesus as their messiah. However, God has said that Israel is still the little maiden of His eye. And in Zechariah, there is no clearer picture. A time is coming where they will come to believe. But things must come to pass first.
In eschatology, their is a chronology to be found. First, the Temple must be rebuilt. Where is the current Temple foundation? Well, under the Dome of the Rock-- a Muslim shrine, considered the third most holy. This must come to pass first. But Zechariah is clear that they will come to believe in Him whom they pierced.
They were still "contrary", "not pleasing to God", "fill[ing] up their sin" buckets. He claims the Jews to be persecutors of Christ and His followers (1 Thes. 2:14-15).
Yes, the Chief Priests, within the religion of Judaism, did much harm to early Christendom. But you must remember that it is not an indictment against Jews, as a distinct group of people. The charge is within the heart of those who have grown calloused with wickedness. This can and does happen to the most "devout" Christian. I'm sure you've noticed how joyous of an occasion it is at EvC when one stumbles. Well, its the same principle.
Paul has made the distinction between the sinful Jews of old
No, he makes a distinction between true believers and hypocrites. Jesus made the exact same kind of distinction. Its only people like Hitler, Luther, and apparently yourself, to come to such wrong-headed conclusions about what it all means.
Edited by Nemesis Juggernaut, : edit to add
"It is better to shun the bait, than struggle in the snare." -Ravi Zacharias