Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,824 Year: 4,081/9,624 Month: 952/974 Week: 279/286 Day: 0/40 Hour: 0/0


EvC Forum ⇒ Social and Religious Issues ⇒ Social Issues and Creation/Evolution ⇒

Morality Decreasing With Time?

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Morality Decreasing With Time?
fallacycop
Member (Idle past 5547 days)
Posts: 692
From: Fortaleza-CE Brazil
Joined: 02-18-2006

Normal Thread Display
Message 170 of 305 (371764)
12-22-2006 11:22 PM 		Reply to: Message 162 by Hyroglyphx
12-22-2006 12:37 PM

VSL
But this about morality, not physical constants. I only mention to show that in the known universe, absolutes exist.
You might want to google "variable speed of light theory"
​
Edited by fallacycop, : fix quote box
This message is a reply to:
 Message 162 by Hyroglyphx, posted 12-22-2006 12:37 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 171 by Straggler, posted 12-23-2006 8:47 AM fallacycop has replied
fallacycop
Member (Idle past 5547 days)
Posts: 692
From: Fortaleza-CE Brazil
Joined: 02-18-2006

Normal Thread Display
Message 172 of 305 (371802)
12-23-2006 9:14 AM 		Reply to: Message 171 by Straggler
12-23-2006 8:47 AM

Re: VSL
I fail to see how the constancy of the speed of light would lead to absolute morality or the non-constancy lead to non-absolute morality.
​
The two have nothing to do with each other.
Agreed. Perhaps you intended to reply to Nemesis Juggernault instead of me?
This message is a reply to:
 Message 171 by Straggler, posted 12-23-2006 8:47 AM Straggler has not replied
fallacycop
Member (Idle past 5547 days)
Posts: 692
From: Fortaleza-CE Brazil
Joined: 02-18-2006

Normal Thread Display
Message 205 of 305 (372001)
12-24-2006 12:26 PM 		Reply to: Message 195 by Rob
12-24-2006 11:04 AM

Re: On Absolutes
scottness says:
But when you conbine logical consistency with emperical adequacy, and then add 'experential relevance' (or the existential), then you've mixed morality into the whole mixture.
​
I hear:
But when you conbine logical consistency with QUACK-QUACK, and then add QUACK-QUACK (or the existential), then you've mixed morality into the whole mixture.
Why don`t you say something that makes sense for a change?
This message is a reply to:
 Message 195 by Rob, posted 12-24-2006 11:04 AM Rob has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 208 by Rob, posted 12-24-2006 1:00 PM fallacycop has not replied
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024