Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,763 Year: 4,020/9,624 Month: 891/974 Week: 218/286 Day: 25/109 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Evolution is not Abiogenesis
Dr Jack
Member
Posts: 3514
From: Immigrant in the land of Deutsch
Joined: 07-14-2003
Member Rating: 8.4


Message 33 of 251 (653620)
02-23-2012 6:13 AM
Reply to: Message 16 by Warthog
02-23-2012 12:36 AM


No. It is another name for a theory of abiogenesis. The ToE refers only to reproducing living things.
I disagree on this point. In my view, evolution becomes an important part of the theory as soon as you've got replication with inheritance and selection. This, most likely, started occurring some time before you got anything we'd recognise as "living".

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by Warthog, posted 02-23-2012 12:36 AM Warthog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by Warthog, posted 02-23-2012 7:23 AM Dr Jack has seen this message but not replied

  
Dr Jack
Member
Posts: 3514
From: Immigrant in the land of Deutsch
Joined: 07-14-2003
Member Rating: 8.4


Message 58 of 251 (653704)
02-23-2012 5:28 PM
Reply to: Message 48 by Warthog
02-23-2012 11:53 AM


Re: Sigh...
I don't agree that evolution is merely about the origin of species. That is what Darwin discussed, yes, but we've moved on from there - evolution tells us a lot about intraspecific changes and the reasons things are as they are, for example.
Evolutionary theory works for any hereditary replicator. That means it probably played a role in abiogenesis. I certainly find the idea that mere chemistry got to life without it implausible.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by Warthog, posted 02-23-2012 11:53 AM Warthog has seen this message but not replied

  
Dr Jack
Member
Posts: 3514
From: Immigrant in the land of Deutsch
Joined: 07-14-2003
Member Rating: 8.4


Message 90 of 251 (653960)
02-25-2012 4:35 PM
Reply to: Message 89 by dwise1
02-25-2012 3:26 PM


Re: What is Evolution?
I didn't think Darwin used the term 'evolution'?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 89 by dwise1, posted 02-25-2012 3:26 PM dwise1 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 91 by dwise1, posted 02-25-2012 4:51 PM Dr Jack has not replied

  
Dr Jack
Member
Posts: 3514
From: Immigrant in the land of Deutsch
Joined: 07-14-2003
Member Rating: 8.4


Message 93 of 251 (653972)
02-25-2012 5:53 PM
Reply to: Message 92 by Percy
02-25-2012 5:19 PM


Re: What is Evolution?
That's slightly ironic then, since my copy is the sixth edition.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 92 by Percy, posted 02-25-2012 5:19 PM Percy has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024