Evolution is not Abiogenesis

I think we already just saw the full range of buz's contribution in the "Ten Signs" thread. He's a stick in the mud and he's not coming out until he's fossilized.

Good job!I think you have summed up in three sentences what has happened in almost every discussion with every creationist that I have read since I started hanging out here.

I think you are incorrect....it is the only thing that interests atheists. Atheist and Abiogenesis both start with "A". Coincidence? I think not. Atheists have already taken over science and business, schools and churches, Congress, the World, even the Galaxy, so you better watch your step! Actually, it has been under review for 150 years. It has to be one of the most reviewed books in history. 1) So far, there have not been any studies of ID, so if any of your listed designers were actually shown to exist, someone might actually want to study ID.2) As others have already pointed out, by Darwin in 1860, in Origin of Species.I have to ask you, are you pissed because no ID supporters are interested in doing any scientific research into ID (they are only interested in saying evolution is wrong), or are you pissed because no actual scientists are interested in conducting research on ID?Scientists, at least the ones I know, go into the fields of research that personally interests them. Do you think someone should order scientist to study ID? I seem to remember some foundation (Templeton?) that was offering to fund research into ID. Any Nobel winners yet?-