Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 49 (9215 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: Candle3
Post Volume: Total: 920,100 Year: 422/6,935 Month: 422/275 Week: 139/159 Day: 2/15 Hour: 1/0


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Creation/Evolution Miscellany ⇒

Evolution is not Abiogenesis

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Evolution is not Abiogenesis
Chuck77
Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display

(3)
Message 24 of 251 (653607)
02-23-2012 4:10 AM 		Reply to: Message 21 by Trixie
02-23-2012 3:02 AM

Re: Message from Buzsaw
Buzsaw message to Trixie writes:
​
I have never ever alleged that abiogenesis is evolution. My position is emphatically that it MUST happen before evolution can begin. The beginning of life by whatever means is the biopoesis. Once this biopoesis happens evolution can allegedly begin.
​
-Bold mine
​
For sake of argument and discussion I can agree with Buz concerning this scenerio.
​
For the record I do not believe evolution happened. I believe the literal interpretation of Genesis and believe abiogenesis and evolution should not be seperated.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by Trixie, posted 02-23-2012 3:02 AM Trixie has not replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by Tangle, posted 02-23-2012 4:22 AM Chuck77 has replied
 Message 38 by Theodoric, posted 02-23-2012 8:42 AM Chuck77 has not replied
 Message 42 by Coyote, posted 02-23-2012 10:28 AM Chuck77 has not replied
  
Chuck77
Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display

(4)
Message 26 of 251 (653609)
02-23-2012 4:32 AM 		Reply to: Message 25 by Tangle
02-23-2012 4:22 AM

Re: Message from Buzsaw
I don't think they SHOULD be different. I think ORIGINS should be incorporated with the theory. It's not because there wouldn't be one if it was.
​
My point is regardless of evolution being true or not it avoids one of the most important questions. How did it all start? What evolved from what? Could it have evolved or was it already created like the Bible says?
​
Origins is important. It shouldn't be swept under the rug and labled another theory. It is because it hampers the TOE.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by Tangle, posted 02-23-2012 4:22 AM Tangle has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 27 by Tangle, posted 02-23-2012 4:41 AM Chuck77 has replied
 Message 30 by Straggler, posted 02-23-2012 4:50 AM Chuck77 has not replied
 Message 31 by Dr Adequate, posted 02-23-2012 4:52 AM Chuck77 has not replied
 Message 34 by Warthog, posted 02-23-2012 7:10 AM Chuck77 has replied
 Message 36 by crashfrog, posted 02-23-2012 7:37 AM Chuck77 has not replied
 Message 46 by Taq, posted 02-23-2012 11:31 AM Chuck77 has not replied
  
Chuck77
Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display

(2)
Message 28 of 251 (653611)
02-23-2012 4:46 AM 		Reply to: Message 27 by Tangle
02-23-2012 4:41 AM

Re: Message from Buzsaw
Tangle writes:
​
Whether they should or shouldn't be different is utterly irrelevant - surely you can see that?
​
They ARE different; that's all that matters.
​
Oh, ok. Sorry to have disturbed you guys. Cheerio.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by Tangle, posted 02-23-2012 4:41 AM Tangle has not replied
  
Chuck77
Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display

(1)
(2)
Message 29 of 251 (653612)
02-23-2012 4:49 AM 		Reply to: Message 27 by Tangle
02-23-2012 4:41 AM

Re: Message from Buzsaw
Tangle writes:
​
I thought it might be useful to start a thread on how scientists explain the difference between the Theory of Evolution, the various ideas about how life started here on earth and why religious believers find it so hard to grasp what scientists think is a simple and obvious point.
​
I fell for what you said in your OP, my bad.
​
Are we just gonna go with your last comment? That "they ARE different, that's all that matters?"
​
It's a far cry form you original proposal.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by Tangle, posted 02-23-2012 4:41 AM Tangle has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 32 by Tangle, posted 02-23-2012 5:24 AM Chuck77 has not replied
  
Chuck77
Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display

(8)
Message 67 of 251 (653746)
02-24-2012 3:53 AM

Edited.
​
Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.
Replies to this message:
 Message 68 by Trixie, posted 02-24-2012 4:23 AM Chuck77 has seen this message but not replied
 Message 69 by Dr Adequate, posted 02-24-2012 4:56 AM Chuck77 has seen this message but not replied
 Message 71 by crashfrog, posted 02-24-2012 7:36 AM Chuck77 has seen this message but not replied
 Message 72 by RAZD, posted 02-24-2012 9:52 AM Chuck77 has seen this message but not replied
 Message 74 by Taq, posted 02-24-2012 12:15 PM Chuck77 has seen this message but not replied
 Message 75 by Percy, posted 02-24-2012 1:35 PM Chuck77 has seen this message but not replied
 Message 76 by NoNukes, posted 02-24-2012 2:16 PM Chuck77 has seen this message but not replied
 Message 77 by jar, posted 02-24-2012 3:42 PM Chuck77 has not replied
 Message 79 by dwise1, posted 02-24-2012 3:51 PM Chuck77 has seen this message but not replied
 Message 81 by Meddle, posted 02-24-2012 10:14 PM Chuck77 has seen this message but not replied
  
Chuck77
Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display
Message 82 of 251 (653870)
02-25-2012 2:02 AM 		Reply to: Message 34 by Warthog
02-23-2012 7:10 AM

Re: Message from Buzsaw
Sorry Warthhog. I forgot to mention this post of yours in my previous general reply.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 34 by Warthog, posted 02-23-2012 7:10 AM Warthog has seen this message but not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2025