idscience writes:
I don't accept homology and morphology as evidence as it is inference without testability, and a circular argument. The same evidence could infer common design. Common components over a varied selection of organisms as well as similar building codes (hox genes, DNA) suggest to many common design.
So you reject homology and morphology as evidence for ID as well.
Is that correct?
I'd also be interested in an explanation of your claim of circularity, particularly in light of the confirming evidence found in the fossil record.
As your post stands, you seem to be attempting to poison the evidentiary well with bare assertion.
"If you can keep your head while those around you are losing theirs, you can collect a lot of heads."
™ Version 4.2
