Summations Only

The Gish Gallop continues.What in this post is a definition of Macroevolution? You were asked for a definition. Instead you throw more crap against the wall. Nothing stuck. It is your topic. It would be nice if you stayed on topic. But alas I am sure it is to much to ask.

You have been told many times in a short period of time that until you give your definition of Macroevolution there can be no discussion. You may be arguing something that is not the same definition as we have. Actually I am quite sure you are. So either define it or take your trollish behaviour elsewhere.

Evidently you cannot even define the term you want to discuss. It must be really hard to be against something if you don't even know what it is.Oh and please stop the Gish Gallop. It just makes you look like an incompetent buffoon. Define Macro-evolution and stay on that topic.Oh yeah have you ever heard of spell check or proofreading. You might want to learn about There and They're. That's a real silly mistake that stands out and really makes it tough to take you seriously.

Alas, this does not seem to be idboys definition. So I guess this thread should be closed. Message 48 Message 67I will not ay anymore as it will result in a suspension.But this says it all. Message 49Edited by Theodoric, : subtitle change

Provide examples and evidence please. Nah not worth a suspension.

Because no one with a scientific mind would think it could do anything else. Anything else would disprove the TOE.The only people that think 1+1 should equal anything but 2 would be believes in magic or some magic sky daddy.You have a lot of word salad here and nothing countering all the evidence against your religious beliefs. I highly doubt this little advertisement here is going to get you many hits. If you arguments there are as non-existent as they here then as they say; You got nothing.

This was a classic EVC thread. ID/Creo posted an OP stating there is no evidence. Reams of evidence was presented. The original poster did nothing to counter evidence just claimed he wouldn't accept the evidence.All IDboy and BigAl did this whole thread was hand wave, and go on a Gish gallop. Oh almost forgot meals and meals of word salad. They again, as always, have nothing to counter the evidence except to say it isn't evidence.ID/Creos will never ever learn. They truly believe that attempting to undermine the TOE will somehow strengthen their pet ideas. The TOE could be utterly destroyed as a Theory today(by scientific research) and that would in no way strengthen ID or creationism. They have an utter lack of understanding the nature of evidence and why they need it, if they want their ideas to be taken seriously.Ain't gonna happen. They have nothing, know they have nothing, so resort to attacking the TOE.Nothing new to see here folks. Move along.