idscience writes:
Really? that is your answer?
Uhm yes. Why? Are you saying mutations do not alter the genome?
When I posted here, you guys were all over me about citing sources. With all the jibber jabber that has gone on since, only one dude has offered a paper for me to look at.
Actually, two guys have. Coyote has provided you with a whole list of papers, which you said you would read, and Crashfrog provided you with a very specific example.
Since there are a hundred of you shooting from the hip and only one of me, I am only going to respond to relevant replies with sources to back up any rebuts. I can't spend the day here.
There aren't "hundreds", but sure if you feel overwhelmed, I will step out, and this will be my last post to you.
My purpose was to give evolution a fair shake on my site with the best evidence it has to offer. I was hoping I could have got that here, but it seems like your more interested in slagging ID, that sharing specific reasons why you believe what you believe.
If you want the best evidence for macro evolution, all you had to do was go to google scholar and type in "macro evolution" in the search box.
Since you seem to like links so much:
here you go, enough evidence to last you a lifetime.
As I said, I will now bow out. Unless you've got some specific questions. I'd be more than willing to answer them.
Thanks for the debate.