Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 63 (9045 total)
329 online now:
AnswersInGenitals, DrJones*, dwise1, nwr, PaulK (5 members, 324 visitors)
Newest Member: Dade
Post Volume: Total: 887,375 Year: 5,021/14,102 Month: 619/707 Week: 17/157 Day: 17/22 Hour: 0/2

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   March 2012 - Post of the Month
Inactive Member

Message 11 of 24 (655531)
03-11-2012 11:25 AM
Reply to: Message 6 by Percy
03-08-2012 8:45 AM

Re: Caffeine, at "Of Snarks and Dogpiles"
Percy writes:

Panda writes:

Panda writes:
(I have no idea why Buz voted it down. *puzzled*)

My own theory? As with most of what he reads, he misinterpreted it.

Though POM is not for discussion etc, since some wondered why, I'll post a one message explanation. I jeered Caffeine's because the message implicated all creationists in one lump, which is, of course certainly objectionable to evolutionists as well. This happens all to often, imo.

Creationists never learn!' ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

If you lack the energy to deal with any more creationist nonsense, then stop listening to it. Read something else, or go for a walk, or get pissed, or find a new hobby.

Any active member on this board should be aware that the Buzsaw Hypothesis is unique in many ways from that of most. There are many other creationists of whom the allegations in the message would not apply.

I've read Dwise's entire long discourse on problematic creationists. There's a lot in that discourse of Dwises that I fully agree to, having encountered some of them as a non-conformist to the mainliner YECs. I am not popular among YECs in and out of church circles; in fact as unpopular as I am here, idiologically. I've found it necessary to pretty much stand alone, effectively advocating for an irrifutable rock solid ID Biblical creationist alternative.

ABE: Via research, being fully convinced that The Biblical record is reliable, I agree to Caffeine and Dwise's allegations that here that, for the most part, there is no viable creationist paradigm on origins etc. Therefore it's high time for a viable one to be found and aired. I and other creationist non-conforists should not be lumped together with the majority.

Edited by Buzsaw, : No reason given.

Edited by Buzsaw, : No reason given.

The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.

Someone wisely said something ;ike, "Before fooling with a fool, make sure the fool is a fool." :)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by Percy, posted 03-08-2012 8:45 AM Percy has acknowledged this reply

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2021