Summations Only

Foreveryoung, debate is all about despised/opposing POVs. What do you expect, for your POVs to be compatible with all? If you don't think your POV is powerful enough to defend, better not debate it in any fora.I agree with Razd and Trixie that my opponents have taught me a lot here over the years, not only about their POVs but about my own, in that their challenges has required me to examine my own so as to ascertain whether it stands up to the test.

Others have left for a spell to return after a respite, including me. Hopefully this will be the case with Foreveryoung.Creationists need you here Fearandloathing. We'll leave the proverbial lights on for you.

BTW, my own, for the most part has stood up to the test, so as to give the best of my pack, of opponents including the science doctorates a run for the money. They don't usually KO my stuff in a page or two.Of course, Admin, et al's response to that is that it's lil' ole me that drags them on, but I've shown that it's largely the cite pack of trollish one or two liners and repetitive demands for whatever by ever present stalkers, Admin, et al.Another thing about my stuff is that it draws in responders and even lurkers who wish to join the fray. The Exodus comes to mind in that regard. Lyndonshire on redshift the topic of redshift/alleged expansion of space was another.I'm all the more convinced of my own Biblical POV having sized it up with counter secularistic POVs.Theirs is all bass-akwards and totally illogical. Allegedly utter chaos progresses into incomprehensible complexity, design and order naturally void of planning or designing.Their temporal universe's zero or whatever event had no space in which to happen, no time in which to happen, no reason to happen, no outside of into which to expand; nothing.OTH, mine has a reason to have happened, eternity to have existed, unbounded space in which to exist expand and or contract etc, and a planner, manager, designer, worker in order to arrange elements of chaos into complexity and order. So no, whether my POV is acceptable here at EvC matters not a lot. When I get censored by burnings or whatever, there's usually something to debate over cups of coffee, though eventually caffeine leaves me sleepless. The full buffet bar that most get would be nice for a change. the nature of scientific evidence? Whatever the heck is that and from who's perspective??(wink wink)

Hi Percy. I've recently done an in-depth study of chapter two, thought and prayed about it. I believe I can explain it all, but have so much on my plate business wise now that it may be a spell before I can do a thread on it.It seems that there is a thread in the archives on that. I'll see if I can search it out.