Summations Only

Other niches are already filled with species adapted to them.For the dogs to move they would have to out-compete other species in areas that those other species are already well-adapted to, and adapt to those other environments at the same time.Not as easy as it looks.But this is off topic. You need to address some of the criticisms of your posts. If I may mix metaphors, you're trailing about 99-0 in the 4th quarter and sinking fast.

Your premise and conclusions are entirely wrong, as has been explained to you by numerous posters.(Note my signature, below.)

Your argument is only as good as the evidence supporting it.Here are some definitions that might help:

Theory: a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world; an organized system of accepted knowledge that applies in a variety of circumstances to explain a specific set of phenomena; theories can incorporate facts and laws and tested hypotheses. Theories do not grow up to be laws. Theories explain laws.

​

Theory: A scientifically testable general principle or body of principles offered to explain observed phenomena. In scientific usage, a theory is distinct from a hypothesis (or conjecture) that is proposed to explain previously observed phenomena. For a hypothesis to rise to the level of theory, it must predict the existence of new phenomena that are subsequently observed. A theory can be overturned if new phenomena are observed that directly contradict the theory. [Source]

​

When a scientific theory has a long history of being supported by verifiable evidence, it is appropriate to speak about "acceptance" of (not "belief" in) the theory; or we can say that we have "confidence" (not "faith") in the theory. It is the dependence on verifiable data and the capability of testing that distinguish scientific theories from matters of faith.

​

Hypothesis: a tentative theory about the natural world; a concept that is not yet verified but that if true would explain certain facts or phenomena; "a scientific hypothesis that survives experimental testing becomes a scientific theory"; "he proposed a fresh theory of alkalis that later was accepted in chemical practices."

​

Speculation: a hypothesis that has been formed by speculating or conjecturing (usually with little hard evidence). When a scientist speculates he is drawing on experience, patterns and somewhat unrelated things that are known or appear to be likely. This becomes a very informed guess.

​

Data: Individual measurements; facts, figures, pieces of information, statistics, either historical or derived by calculation, experimentation, surveys, etc.; evidence from which conclusions can be inferred.

​

Science: a method of learning about the world by applying the principles of the scientific method, which includes making empirical observations, proposing hypotheses to explain those observations, and testing those hypotheses in valid and reliable ways; also refers to the organized body of knowledge that results from scientific study.

​

The only claim I can find in this thread is the following: You have already been shown by several posters how your claim is incorrect.If you persist in your claim, even after being shown that it is incorrect, what you need to do is show some evidence that supports it.This can be done in either of two ways: 1) show where the counter claims made by other posters are incorrect, or 2) provide a model, with supporting evidence, that shows how new structures appeared if they did not do so through evolution.

See Message 61.That showed formation of a new structure where it had not previously existed.That alone falsifies your claim.