Logic is either right or it is wrong. It is based upon premises.
Sorry, but this is a completely mistaken view of logic.
Logic is either
valid or invalid. Logic is a set of "transformations" that input premises and output conclusions, with the proviso that each transformation is valid if it preserves the truth value of the input; that is, if you input true premises and use only valid transformations, then your conclusions will be similarly true.
Logic
is based on premises, but the truth or falsity of those premises cannot be proven, they can only be assumed. Statements in logic are therefore all tautologies; only true because their premises are assumed.
It is for this reason that science is based on evidence, not logic. Propositions in science rest or fall on the basis of evidence. If you cannot marshal evidence in favor of your views, it's unreasonable to expect anyone to accept them. Many things we know to be false about the universe are completely logical; the "luminiferous ether" was assumed to exist based on the very simple logic that if light is a wave, it must be a wave of
something. But the existence of the luminiferous ether was disproven by the Michaelson-Morley experiment in 1887.
Just please quite the tired old "evidence" malarkey.
Evidence is not "malarkey", it is the basis of all scientific reasoning.
™ Version 4.2
(1)
