Register | Sign In

Understanding through Discussion

EvC Forum active members: 50 (9179 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: Jorge Parker
Post Volume: Total: 918,209 Year: 5,466/9,624 Month: 491/323 Week: 131/204 Day: 1/4 Hour: 0/0

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   Superiority of the 'Protestant Canon'?
Evangelical Humanists
Junior Member (Idle past 4366 days)
Posts: 14
Joined: 05-27-2012

Message 18 of 154 (663979)
05-28-2012 7:31 AM
Reply to: Message 12 by Jzyehoshua
05-26-2012 8:22 PM

Re: Please present one of the original autographs.
Josh McDowell in "More Than a Carpenter" addressed these tests for historicity (Ch. 4 I believe - need to find my copy), and by them the New Testament is more reliable than any other ancient document in antiquity.
I would hardly call the NT a reliable document. Scholars are not even sure of the authors of some of the books. Matthew, Mark and Luke practically copy each other with a few word changes here and there. McDowell as a biased opinion no doubt.
By checking McDowell's sources and consulting works of NT scholars, I was eventually able to discover that much of what McDowell presents is untrustworthy, misleading or simply incorrect.
The above is from a rebuttal on his book "Evidence that Demands a Verdict" Quite frankly christian apologists will say or do anything to prove it true and McDowell is no different.
I believe in order to establish its superiority as you say I think one would have to prove that the very person it was written about ever existed.
Edited by Evangelical Humanists, : Add something.
Edited by AdminPD, : Warning

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by Jzyehoshua, posted 05-26-2012 8:22 PM Jzyehoshua has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by AdminPD, posted 05-28-2012 7:58 AM Evangelical Humanists has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024