Summations Only

Um, what about this: I like pictures, so here's a couple to reiterate Trixie's point about the bath water being better than your sponge:Here's some water going down a drain: Here is a spiral galaxy: Its all that mass at the center of the galaxy pulling everything inwards that makes those spirals, not anything like the outward force of the water leaving your spinning sponge.

---

You can click on the peek button at the bottom right to see the codes I used to quote and add pictures.

That's one of the stupidest things I've read in a while... Have you never heard of nuclear fusion?Where did all the energy for that bomb come from? Oh, and how would a galaxy explode? WTF? Yeah, physics ain't easy to understand. And it is counter-intuitive. But your failings in understanding are no problem for it, itself. Which goes to show that you're spouting erroneous bullshit, not that we, ourselves, are lacking anything.I don't see any value or integrity to you postings.

I prefer anonimity... One of the best rules is argue the position, not the person. It doesn't matter who you are. Your position, otoh, can be easily critiqued. That's actually a bad sign... physics is counter-intuitive. Uncriticized, though? You didn't even respond to the fact that draining water looks more like a spiral galaxy than a spinning sponge does. I studied the physics of light and it was difficult, but it was at a Big 10 University... I saw the theory and then we went into the physics lab and saw it for ourselves. It was right. The physics calculations were spot on.Don’t let your belief in god get in the way

Quit wasting your and our time then. Spend less time writing up one-liners to every single post and start getting into make some valid points... Be honest: you don't have any sources at all, do you?Don't respong to that with a "yes", respond to it with the actual sources.

From that article:

quote:

---

{A team} has discovered the ruins of a planetary system, consisting of the cores of two former giant planets stripped of their gaseous envelopes, orbiting around the remnants of the core of a red giant. These two exoplanets are the smallest, hottest and closest to their parent star ever discovered. This finding, published in the 22 December 2011 issue of the journal Nature could shed new light on the fate of planetary systems.

---

Accretion theory and planetary formation are about the beginning of a planet's life, the article you linked to is about the end of those planet's lives

By reading the Bible, silly. Duh!

Under my theory, your theory is stupid because you're just making shit up and trying to get stuff to stick to it.