Summations Only

Every assertion in physics must be able to be documented mathematically. Physics is not language class or postmodernist philosophy. It is also not Deepak Chopra or Carlos Castaneda. Of course not, and in your theory of life, the universe, and everything apparently Oppenheimer never existed, nor do nuclear power plants or nuclear bombs. Do you understand what the variables represent in E= mc2? OK, found your answer to my previous question. And how pray tell, do we understand gravity without knowing how it acts according to Einstein and Newton's approximation, electricity without Maxwell, and light without quantum physics? And on top of that do it all without having to resort to that terrible math? I assure you, I have deep respect for your story-telling abilities, and as a resident of Texas for the last 18 years, I should be in a position to know a good tall tale when I hear one.Please continue. I find your approach to physics rather fascinating.

If sunspots leave a scar every time the sun farts out a planet, where are the scars that identify each planet (I would imagine Jupiter and Saturn must have been like a fine dining experience at Taco Bell). I had a 4.5 inch Newtonian reflector as a kid, used to observe the sun a lot in the daytime (safety tip-indirectly), couple of transits but sure don't remember any permanent scars. Also are you not contradicting yourself by stating sunspots come and go yet according to the solar-planetary diarrhea hypothesis the process should leave permanent scars?Where are the scars?Oh, oh, oh, I have a trick question... let's see if you are able to solve the riddle.How about trans-Neptunium bodies, you know like Pluto, Eris, Quaoar, and Sedna. Orbits all off the plane (Eris 44 degrees), orbits all eccentric (Sedna 10k years). Maybe the sun should have seen a doctor, I know the astrologers should have.Oh the possibilities! I must say, it truly boggles the mind.

There is nothing I could add to your own words to make the case you are abysmally ignorant of mathematics and physical science, and with such a contempt for the former, until your understanding of their relationship makes a 'quantum leap' forward, you will remain abysmally ignorant of these subjects forever.Edited by anglagard, : user latter, meant formerEdited by anglagard, : fix clumsy sentence end.

Whoa there cowboy, that's quite a tall order.You know, since you obviously prefer words to equations in your theory of life, the universe, and everything may I offer a humble suggestion.Perhaps before you challenge the accepted knowledge concerning cosmology and relativity, wouldn't you like to know how it is done by those who have successfully achieved that very thing in general (or special) cases before you?Try the Structure of Scientific Revolutions by Thomas Kuhn, no math, not even a 42nd chapter IIRC, but it does unavoidably have a page 42.Just a bit of friendly advice.

I'm sure you can teach the Insane Clown Posse a thing or two about magnets, given your deep experience with sponge and stick experiments.