Hi ICANT,
No, I am not a creationist in the overwhelmingly most common meaning of that term. That is, I do not believe that a literal reading of the bible describes the history of mankind or the universe in an accurate way.
ICANT writes:
I gather from Son's posts to me that he seems to believe the universe began to exist from a point called a singularity which is nothing but a place where the math will not work.
Think about this logically. How could I believe that the universe came from a place where maths doesn't work? That would be like believing that the universe came from a place where a story "wasn't written".
What do I think:
1. The universe from today until about 13.7 billion years is well described by the standard cosmological model, which is mostly derived from General Relativity.
2. I know that that model stops working at a certain point 13.7 billion years.
So, I have a scientific knowledge of the last 13.7 billion years of cosmic history. At no point do I make a claim of the universe's origin.
However I do think that West Semitic literature written around three thousand years does not contain an accurate depiction of what occurred.
This thread is about how frequently people met individuals during their youth who did think West Semitic literature written around three thousand years actually describes the history of the world.
I hope that is clear enough.
Edited by Son Goku, : Would -> What, I think I can't spell anymore!