Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 53 (9179 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: Jorge Parker
Upcoming Birthdays: Theodoric
Post Volume: Total: 918,133 Year: 5,390/9,624 Month: 415/323 Week: 55/204 Day: 31/24 Hour: 3/5


EvC Forum Side Orders Coffee House Creationist Shortage

Summations Only

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Creationist Shortage
Panda
Member (Idle past 3822 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010


(1)
Message 6 of 415 (661376)
05-04-2012 9:34 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by Buzsaw
05-04-2012 9:16 PM


Re: Where Are The Creationists
Buzsaw writes:
...and now member Percy is demanding that I cease and desist posting on topic messages relating to how commodity goods made investors of it wealthy while $$ assets infate, becoming ever more worthless making these people less wealthy. He cited Dr Adequate's response as well, demanding no more responses relating to my message. He's made similar demands, even at FreeForAll.
Links or it never happened.

Tradition and heritage are all dead people's baggage. Stop carrying it!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Buzsaw, posted 05-04-2012 9:16 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Panda
Member (Idle past 3822 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010


Message 25 of 415 (661408)
05-05-2012 8:02 AM
Reply to: Message 23 by Granny Magda
05-05-2012 7:28 AM


GM writes:
GDR and Catholic Scientist for example have thick skins and give as good as they get.
imho, I don't think GDR has displayed having particularly thick skin - I don't think he has needed to.
He simply doesn't encourage/deserve posts that could be considered abusive.
Certainly, I have seen some strong discussions take place, but they were gentlemanly in nature.
Although it sounds like I am cheer-leading for GDR, I simply wished to point out that not all creationists should be tarred with the same brush.
Just sayin'.

Tradition and heritage are all dead people's baggage. Stop carrying it!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by Granny Magda, posted 05-05-2012 7:28 AM Granny Magda has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 26 by Granny Magda, posted 05-05-2012 8:06 AM Panda has seen this message but not replied

  
Panda
Member (Idle past 3822 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010


(3)
(2)
Message 36 of 415 (661644)
05-08-2012 10:30 PM
Reply to: Message 35 by Bolder-dash
05-08-2012 9:41 PM


Re: Its a debate site??
Bolder-dash writes:
AND ALTHOUGH VIRTUALLY ANYTHING THEY SAY WILL EITHER BE CENSORED
A bare-faced lie.
Edited by Panda, : No reason given.

Tradition and heritage are all dead people's baggage. Stop carrying it!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by Bolder-dash, posted 05-08-2012 9:41 PM Bolder-dash has not replied

  
Panda
Member (Idle past 3822 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010


(1)
Message 45 of 415 (661685)
05-09-2012 9:55 AM
Reply to: Message 44 by Buzsaw
05-09-2012 9:34 AM


Re: Who Takes Who Seriously
Buzsaw writes:
Not sure, but likely relating to how the Crysper System applies the DNA factor, relative to macro-evolution, more-so than for evolution of species.
Nice try at pretending that you know what you are saying, but it is completely undermined by the fact you failed to produce a cogent sentence.
But it is interesting to see your dishonesty - "before your God as witness".

Tradition and heritage are all dead people's baggage. Stop carrying it!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by Buzsaw, posted 05-09-2012 9:34 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Panda
Member (Idle past 3822 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010


(3)
Message 85 of 415 (662066)
05-11-2012 11:09 PM
Reply to: Message 84 by foreveryoung
05-11-2012 10:55 PM


foreveryoung writes:
If I told you want I wanted to do to some of you guys after reading your posts, it would not only get me banned but would result in cops banging on my front door.
Once again you show your true face: hatred and violence.

Tradition and heritage are all dead people's baggage. Stop carrying it!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 84 by foreveryoung, posted 05-11-2012 10:55 PM foreveryoung has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 108 by foreveryoung, posted 05-12-2012 10:13 PM Panda has replied

  
Panda
Member (Idle past 3822 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010


Message 96 of 415 (662103)
05-12-2012 10:26 AM
Reply to: Message 95 by Tangle
05-12-2012 10:11 AM


Re: Evolutionists Behaving Like Jerks
Tangle writes:
I don't believe there are any better moderated discussion boards...
/agree
Tangle writes:
If you keep to the rules and follow advice...
And even if you don't, you get suspended many times before being perma-banned.

Tradition and heritage are all dead people's baggage. Stop carrying it!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 95 by Tangle, posted 05-12-2012 10:11 AM Tangle has not replied

  
Panda
Member (Idle past 3822 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010


(3)
Message 112 of 415 (662170)
05-13-2012 2:34 AM
Reply to: Message 108 by foreveryoung
05-12-2012 10:13 PM


Projection
FEY writes:
You and many here show true hatred and violence toward creationists on almost every post. What? You don't think you do because you don't make overt and obvious posts like I do? You and most of the anti-creationists on this board ooze hatred toward creationists from every pore. It is built into your DNA. You have done it all of your life, so it has got to the point where it is just a part of daily life for you. In short, when you point a finger at me regarding my character, you have three fingers pointing right back at you. You are just another arrogant , fucking hypocrite.
As CrashFrog said, I have very little regard for you.
To hate you would be to elevate you beyond the standing of being "just another random poster on a forum".
So, since I know I don't hate you, why would you make such claims?
Perhaps the answer lies here:
quote:
Psychological projection or projection bias is a psychological defense mechanism where a person subconsciously denies his or her own attributes, thoughts, and emotions, which are then ascribed to the outside world, usually to other people. Thus, projection involves imagining or projecting the belief that others originate those feelings. (Wiki)
quote:
In psychology, the false-consensus effect is a cognitive bias whereby a person tends to overestimate how much other people agree with him or her. There is a tendency for people to assume that their own opinions, beliefs, preferences, values and habits are 'normal' and that others also think the same way that they do. (Wiki)

Tradition and heritage are all dead people's baggage. Stop carrying it!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 108 by foreveryoung, posted 05-12-2012 10:13 PM foreveryoung has not replied

  
Panda
Member (Idle past 3822 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010


(1)
(1)
Message 139 of 415 (662371)
05-15-2012 5:20 AM
Reply to: Message 138 by Bolder-dash
05-14-2012 11:10 PM


Re: why there are no creationists here
Bolder-dash writes:
Am I allowed to give you a warning for being off topic Percy, like Dr.A always does, or RAZD or Jar...?
We understand your struggle with reality.
Your behaviour is forgiven.
/pat

Tradition and heritage are all dead people's baggage. Stop carrying it!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 138 by Bolder-dash, posted 05-14-2012 11:10 PM Bolder-dash has not replied

  
Panda
Member (Idle past 3822 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010


(2)
(3)
Message 147 of 415 (662428)
05-15-2012 7:28 PM
Reply to: Message 146 by Bolder-dash
05-15-2012 6:57 PM


Re: why there are no creationists here
So, your reply is just a long-winded version of "I know you are, but what am I?".
/pat
Go on. Go and play outside now.

Tradition and heritage are all dead people's baggage. Stop carrying it!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 146 by Bolder-dash, posted 05-15-2012 6:57 PM Bolder-dash has not replied

  
Panda
Member (Idle past 3822 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010


Message 171 of 415 (667352)
07-06-2012 9:53 AM
Reply to: Message 169 by nwr
07-06-2012 9:34 AM


Re: Did we win?
nwr writes:
I'm guessing, but I suspect that this is due to the increasing role of the Internet. It has become quite hard to keep those children ignorant.
Separate from (and including) the E. vs C. debate, I fervently hope this is true.

CRYSTALS!!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 169 by nwr, posted 07-06-2012 9:34 AM nwr has seen this message but not replied

  
Panda
Member (Idle past 3822 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010


Message 182 of 415 (667415)
07-06-2012 11:18 PM
Reply to: Message 176 by marc9000
07-06-2012 9:34 PM


Re: What's the purpose here?
marc9000 writes:
...yet there is no sub-forum that examines the relationship between evolution and atheism.
That is because there is no relationship between them.
marc9000 writes:
If that sub-forum existed, I believe I would have a renewed interest in starting threads and posting more than I currently do.
You don't need a whole forum.
Just propose a thread.

CRYSTALS!!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 176 by marc9000, posted 07-06-2012 9:34 PM marc9000 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 189 by marc9000, posted 07-07-2012 9:00 PM Panda has replied

  
Panda
Member (Idle past 3822 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010


(2)
Message 194 of 415 (667475)
07-07-2012 11:08 PM
Reply to: Message 189 by marc9000
07-07-2012 9:00 PM


Re: What's the purpose here?
marc9000 writes:
I know that’s the politically correct mantra, but there’s plenty of evidence that shows there is. The word "evidence" isn't the exclusive property of evolutionists.
True.
Perhaps you could provide some?
marc9000 writes:
As things are now, if I propose a thread about the relationship between evolution and atheism, it gets buried somewhere in the coffee house, or free for all forums
Can you give me an example of this happening?
What thread did you propose that ended up in in the Coffee House or Free For All?
marc9000 writes:
This new forum could have the descriptive line; Do evolutionists start out as atheists? Or do they study evolution first and then become atheists?
Do you know what a loaded question is?
Do you know why it is dishonest?
Do you think a dishonest forum title is the best way to start a debate?
marc9000 writes:
The descriptive line that I suggested above, about what the mindset is of beginning evolutionists/atheists could be applied to the authors of the following books;
If I provide a list of 'evolution' books authored by men will that show a link from 'evolution' to 'being male'?
marc9000 writes:
Evolutionists don’t want to discuss some things about evolution. It’s not politically healthy for them.
This forum is filled with 'evolutionists' that have no political health to risk.
It is the creationists that are absent, remember?
Edited by Panda, : No reason given.
Edited by Panda, : No reason given.

CRYSTALS!!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 189 by marc9000, posted 07-07-2012 9:00 PM marc9000 has not replied

  
Panda
Member (Idle past 3822 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010


(2)
(1)
Message 209 of 415 (668094)
07-17-2012 5:35 AM
Reply to: Message 202 by marc9000
07-16-2012 8:17 PM


Re: What's the purpose here?
marc9000 writes:
Why do you pretend to know what I’ve read? Are you trying to say that those books have different content than their titles suggest? Their reviews say otherwise, as do the contents of Stenger’s book, which I actually have on my shelf.
Which is you confirming that you have only read 1 of the 14 books you listed.
If you can't be bothered to read the books, then why should I?
And even if I did, you could not discuss their contents, because you haven't read them.
marc9000 writes:
7-7-12) this thread, with no new references to the book list.
Which is patently not true.
This becomes obvious when we realise that you are replying to a post discussing your book list!
So...you have a list of books you haven't read. Great!
But I think you'll find that this list refutes your list:
(I haven't read them all, but I am sure they contain stuff that counters your arguments.)
If that doesn't convince you, then maybe this will: www.google.com!
(I haven't read it all, but I am sure it contains mountains of evidence that proves you wrong.)

CRYSTALS!!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 202 by marc9000, posted 07-16-2012 8:17 PM marc9000 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 217 by marc9000, posted 07-17-2012 8:55 PM Panda has not replied

  
Panda
Member (Idle past 3822 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010


(1)
(1)
Message 247 of 415 (668262)
07-19-2012 7:09 AM
Reply to: Message 245 by Buzsaw
07-18-2012 11:00 PM


Re: Your God's Book Purposefully Deceives?
Buzsaw writes:
Sure, Jar. Over the years I've cited pages of observable evidence pertaing to history, fulfilled biblical prophecy, archeological discoveries etc, whereas you schooled members have produced no observable evidence for the alleged zero singularity, the BB, alleged biogenesis or early life following it.
It would seem appropriate that when replying to a request for evidence that you actually provide some.
Do you not think it strange that you didn't?
tbh: Your repeated claims to have evidence and repeated refusal to provide any is becoming laughable (and a little bit sad).

CRYSTALS!!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 245 by Buzsaw, posted 07-18-2012 11:00 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 248 by Buzsaw, posted 07-19-2012 7:26 AM Panda has replied

  
Panda
Member (Idle past 3822 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010


Message 258 of 415 (668292)
07-19-2012 12:32 PM
Reply to: Message 248 by Buzsaw
07-19-2012 7:26 AM


Re: Creation Evidence Adventure Into Futility
Buzsaw writes:
Why should I repetitivly repete evidence that you all reject, not willing to admit to one Biblical miracle?
You have only ever repetitively repeated that you have evidence: you have never provided any.
Your inability to even attempt to provide a link to your evidence is clearly indicative of a complete lack of evidence to support your claims.
Buzsaw writes:
Go figure why creationists regard this site as an adventure into futility?
I figure it is because defending biblical literalism is an adventure into futility - especially when you have no evidence.
Edited by Panda, : No reason given.

CRYSTALS!!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 248 by Buzsaw, posted 07-19-2012 7:26 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024