Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 57 (9054 total)
362 online now:
jar, PaulK (2 members, 360 visitors)
Newest Member: EWolf
Post Volume: Total: 888,271 Year: 5,917/14,102 Month: 65/438 Week: 109/83 Day: 11/21 Hour: 0/2

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   No "new information" required
zi ko
Member (Idle past 2684 days)
Posts: 578
Joined: 01-18-2011

Message 6 of 20 (661477)
05-06-2012 11:50 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Trixie
05-04-2012 3:09 PM

A new paper pubished in Cell has serious implications for IDist arguments of "no new information" and "mutation only breaks things".

What does it prove?
An IDist or an agnostic could say: Yes a mutation can bring new information.But the crucial question is if this mutation is random or not.It could be that the Creator had coused this mutation, or the environmental information had facilitated it after original creator's regulation, or natural laws lead to this, through environmental information again.

Edited by zi ko, : No reason given.

'If that much-spoken 'evidence" of followers of random mutations is this 'some evidence' of Panda, then there is a serious matter of credibility in this forum.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Trixie, posted 05-04-2012 3:09 PM Trixie has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by Admin, posted 05-06-2012 2:34 PM zi ko has not yet responded

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2021