A new paper pubished in Cell has serious implications for IDist arguments of "no new information" and "mutation only breaks things".
What does it prove? An IDist or an agnostic could say: Yes a mutation can bring new information.But the crucial question is if this mutation is random or not.It could be that the Creator had coused this mutation, or the environmental information had facilitated it after original creator's regulation, or natural laws lead to this, through environmental information again.
Edited by zi ko, : No reason given.
'If that much-spoken 'evidence" of followers of random mutations is this 'some evidence' of Panda, then there is a serious matter of credibility in this forum.