EvC Forum: Physical Laws ....What if they were different before?

Email This Thread

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Author

Topic: Physical Laws ....What if they were different before?

Theodoric

Member

Posts: 9489

From: Northwest, WI, USA

Joined: 08-15-2005

Member Rating: 7.0

Normal Thread Display

(1)

Message 151 of 309 (664158)
05-29-2012 2:25 PM

Reply to: Message 150 by godsriddle
05-29-2012 2:14 PM

Re: question unanswered ...

I wrote a response but it is lengthy so I posted it on my blog here

http://www.godsriddle.info/2012/05/sn-1987a.html

Either post here or do not bother debating here. No one wants to go to your blog to read your response. Why would we want to give you traffic?

Admin- Is this spam?

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

This message is a reply to:
	Message 150 by godsriddle, posted 05-29-2012 2:14 PM		godsriddle has replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 152 by NoNukes, posted 05-29-2012 2:48 PM	Theodoric has not replied
	Message 155 by godsriddle, posted 05-29-2012 3:48 PM	Theodoric has not replied

Theodoric

Member

Posts: 9489

From: Northwest, WI, USA

Joined: 08-15-2005

Member Rating: 7.0

Normal Thread Display

(1)

Message 217 of 309 (664805)
06-05-2012 11:21 AM

Reply to: Message 205 by foreveryoung
06-05-2012 2:07 AM

Re: jeers

What is so terrible about message 187??????????????

Classic science denialism. You bring forward no argument. The premise of your argument is "God did it".

God did it is not an argument, it is an excuse for intellectual laziness.

131

If you really have to ask about that post then you really don't get it.

Seriously? You have no idea why this drivel was jeered?

Yes it was a rebuttal. I can't help it if you are too retarded to recognize it as such. I already gave you the evidence; its not my fault that your ideology prevents you from accepting it.

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

This message is a reply to:
	Message 205 by foreveryoung, posted 06-05-2012 2:07 AM		foreveryoung has not replied

Theodoric

Member

Posts: 9489

From: Northwest, WI, USA

Joined: 08-15-2005

Member Rating: 7.0

Normal Thread Display

(2)

Message 261 of 309 (664899)
06-06-2012 1:08 PM

Reply to: Message 245 by foreveryoung
06-06-2012 2:47 AM

Re: SN1987A -- part 2: correlations with the speed of light

To me, the speed of light should be infinite in a true vacuum. Light from stars billions of light years away, should immediately be detected by radar telescopes the instant they leave the star in a true vacuum.

That would mean it is a different universe than the one we live in.

But what you believe has no effect on reality and obviously reality has no effect on what you believe.

Please show some sort of reasoning for this idea of yours. Or is this one also to be exempt from evidence?

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

"God did it" is not an argument. It is an excuse for intellectual laziness.

This message is a reply to:
	Message 245 by foreveryoung, posted 06-06-2012 2:47 AM		foreveryoung has not replied

Theodoric

Member

Posts: 9489

From: Northwest, WI, USA

Joined: 08-15-2005

Member Rating: 7.0

Normal Thread Display

(2)

(2)

Message 268 of 309 (664909)
06-06-2012 2:43 PM

Reply to: Message 265 by foreveryoung
06-06-2012 2:31 PM

Re: SN1987A -- part 2: correlations with the speed of light

What the fuck does that sarcastic comment have to do with anything? Do you really think space is a true vacuum bitch? Can you prove it bitch? Are you so fucking dumb that you think just because you measure the speed of light to be 386,000 meters per second , that it must be the TRUE speed of light. Have you even considered that there might be some substance slowing it down? Of course you haven't you dumb fucking bitch. Instead of being sarcastic to people who have ideas beyond your tiny comprehension skills, try to understand why they have these ideas to begin with.

How very christian of you.

Now how about relaxing and providing some evidence for your what if scenarios. Plenty of people has provided EVIDENCE that refutes all of your what ifs. You have provided... lets see...what have you got...something.. yes...something. Oh yeah there it is
GOD DID IT!!!!

How about you read the second line of my signature. Then after you have calmed down try posting some science in a science forum. That would be a nice change of pace for you.

Misogyny the Christian RIGHT thing to do.

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

"God did it" is not an argument. It is an excuse for intellectual laziness.

This message is a reply to:
	Message 265 by foreveryoung, posted 06-06-2012 2:31 PM		foreveryoung has replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 269 by foreveryoung, posted 06-06-2012 2:45 PM	Theodoric has replied
	Message 271 by foreveryoung, posted 06-06-2012 2:48 PM	Theodoric has not replied

Theodoric

Member

Posts: 9489

From: Northwest, WI, USA

Joined: 08-15-2005

Member Rating: 7.0

Normal Thread Display

(2)

Message 273 of 309 (664914)
06-06-2012 2:53 PM

Reply to: Message 269 by foreveryoung
06-06-2012 2:45 PM

Re: SN1987A -- part 2: correlations with the speed of light

I gave you a boatload of evidence you moron. I can't help it that you are stupid as hell.

Made up crap and wild imaginings are not evidence. if you would read the responses to your "evidence" you would see why it is not evidence.

Are you really studying science? You should get your money back. If you do not yet understand the scientific method and what evidence is then you got ripped off. Science does not start with a conclusion and then look for evidence. Science follows where ever the evidence leads.

No I am not stupid as hell. Still waiting for evidence.

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

"God did it" is not an argument. It is an excuse for intellectual laziness.