Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9208 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: Skylink
Post Volume: Total: 919,430 Year: 6,687/9,624 Month: 27/238 Week: 27/22 Day: 0/9 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Physical Laws ....What if they were different before?
foreveryoung
Member (Idle past 833 days)
Posts: 921
Joined: 12-26-2011


(1)
Message 271 of 309 (664912)
06-06-2012 2:48 PM
Reply to: Message 268 by Theodoric
06-06-2012 2:43 PM


Re: SN1987A -- part 2: correlations with the speed of light
I didn't do anything mysogynist either asshole. Are women immune from criticism? I give as I get it. If that bitch is going to talk to me that way, I will return the favor. I don't favor either sex when it comes to defending myself. Are you a sexist or something? Do you think women are too weak to handle cusswords? I treated just like I do the rest of you assholes. You either take back the misogynist comment or go to hell. You know that is an absolute lie. I am not misogynist in the least and you fucking know it. Get the fuck out of here with talk like that.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 268 by Theodoric, posted 06-06-2012 2:43 PM Theodoric has not replied

  
foreveryoung
Member (Idle past 833 days)
Posts: 921
Joined: 12-26-2011


(1)
Message 272 of 309 (664913)
06-06-2012 2:52 PM


If you guys are going to throw around accusations like candy be prepared to defend it. I was accused by the senile old man theodoric of being misogynistic toward trixie. I called her a bitch because she was being a bitch. I call men by much worse. I do not hate women. I hate anyone who treats me like all of you assholes do. I do not shut my mouth when it comes to a woman. She is treated on the same level as the rest of you. To me, it is sexist to treat her with kid gloves.

Replies to this message:
 Message 280 by NoNukes, posted 06-06-2012 3:24 PM foreveryoung has not replied

  
Theodoric
Member
Posts: 9489
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 6.1


(2)
Message 273 of 309 (664914)
06-06-2012 2:53 PM
Reply to: Message 269 by foreveryoung
06-06-2012 2:45 PM


Re: SN1987A -- part 2: correlations with the speed of light
I gave you a boatload of evidence you moron. I can't help it that you are stupid as hell.
Made up crap and wild imaginings are not evidence. if you would read the responses to your "evidence" you would see why it is not evidence.
Are you really studying science? You should get your money back. If you do not yet understand the scientific method and what evidence is then you got ripped off. Science does not start with a conclusion and then look for evidence. Science follows where ever the evidence leads.
No I am not stupid as hell. Still waiting for evidence.

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
"God did it" is not an argument. It is an excuse for intellectual laziness.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 269 by foreveryoung, posted 06-06-2012 2:45 PM foreveryoung has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 274 by foreveryoung, posted 06-06-2012 2:54 PM Theodoric has not replied

  
foreveryoung
Member (Idle past 833 days)
Posts: 921
Joined: 12-26-2011


(1)
Message 274 of 309 (664915)
06-06-2012 2:54 PM
Reply to: Message 273 by Theodoric
06-06-2012 2:53 PM


Re: SN1987A -- part 2: correlations with the speed of light
I gave a solid argument for my ideas. You have yet to refute it. I am sorry you cannot tell the difference between solid arguments and imagination.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 273 by Theodoric, posted 06-06-2012 2:53 PM Theodoric has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 276 by JonF, posted 06-06-2012 3:04 PM foreveryoung has not replied

  
JonF
Member (Idle past 419 days)
Posts: 6174
Joined: 06-23-2003


(2)
Message 275 of 309 (664916)
06-06-2012 3:00 PM
Reply to: Message 267 by foreveryoung
06-06-2012 2:41 PM


Re: SN1987A -- part 2: correlations with the speed of light
I gave a boatload of substantive last night and all you assholes can do is make sarcastic comments
Um, your handwaving fantasies are not substantive. Physics is a quantitative science. When you can show us the math, and enumerate the consequences of your claims, we'll listen.
Until then it's pretty obvious sarcastic comments are the only way to deal with your staggering ignorance and pride in that ignorance.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 267 by foreveryoung, posted 06-06-2012 2:41 PM foreveryoung has not replied

  
JonF
Member (Idle past 419 days)
Posts: 6174
Joined: 06-23-2003


(1)
Message 276 of 309 (664917)
06-06-2012 3:04 PM
Reply to: Message 274 by foreveryoung
06-06-2012 2:54 PM


Re: SN1987A -- part 2: correlations with the speed of light
I gave a solid argument for my ideas
You haven't given any argument for your ideas. Nor have you paid any attention to reality.
An argument for your idea would be a description of the consequences of your claims, and what would or would not be observed if your claims were true. Especially what would be observed differently from what current mainstream theory predicts. And it would be almost impossible to do that without using appropriate math. It would definitely be impossible for one as ignorant as you of physics, math, current theories, and what has been observed.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 274 by foreveryoung, posted 06-06-2012 2:54 PM foreveryoung has not replied

  
Theodoric
Member
Posts: 9489
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 6.1


Message 277 of 309 (664918)
06-06-2012 3:05 PM
Reply to: Message 264 by foreveryoung
06-06-2012 2:18 PM


Re: Speed of Light: the Sequel
The bible is replete with God making claims to creation of the universe.
Hmmm. No it isn't. You might want to look up definition of replete.
I know this is off topic but you are wrong.

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
"God did it" is not an argument. It is an excuse for intellectual laziness.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 264 by foreveryoung, posted 06-06-2012 2:18 PM foreveryoung has not replied

  
dwise1
Member
Posts: 6076
Joined: 05-02-2006
Member Rating: 7.0


Message 278 of 309 (664919)
06-06-2012 3:16 PM
Reply to: Message 267 by foreveryoung
06-06-2012 2:41 PM


Re: SN1987A -- part 2: correlations with the speed of light
I gave a boatload of substantive last night ...
What messages are you referring to here? Message 234 and
Message 235? Where you presented one piece of evidence after another and argued repeatedly for the constancy of physical constants?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 267 by foreveryoung, posted 06-06-2012 2:41 PM foreveryoung has not replied

  
NoNukes
Inactive Member


Message 279 of 309 (664920)
06-06-2012 3:21 PM
Reply to: Message 264 by foreveryoung
06-06-2012 2:18 PM


Re: Speed of Light: the Sequel
The bible is replete with God making claims to creation of the universe.
Sigh.
I asked you a question about authorship. Where in the Bible is there a claim that God wrote the Bible? When you talked about the message on the rock, you claimed that the message identified the creator of the universe as the author of the message on the rock?
I did not intend to ask you a trick question. You obtained the idea that the Bible is supernaturally accurate and written by God from somewhere. If that source is the Bible itself, I'd like you to point that out where the Bible says that.

Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846)
The apathy of the people is enough to make every statue leap from its pedestal and hasten the resurrection of the dead. William Lloyd Garrison

This message is a reply to:
 Message 264 by foreveryoung, posted 06-06-2012 2:18 PM foreveryoung has not replied

  
NoNukes
Inactive Member


Message 280 of 309 (664921)
06-06-2012 3:24 PM
Reply to: Message 272 by foreveryoung
06-06-2012 2:52 PM


Plonk..
I hate anyone who treats me like all of you assholes do. I do not shut my mouth when it comes to a woman. She is treated on the same level as the rest of you.
To /dev/null with you.

Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846)
The apathy of the people is enough to make every statue leap from its pedestal and hasten the resurrection of the dead. William Lloyd Garrison

This message is a reply to:
 Message 272 by foreveryoung, posted 06-06-2012 2:52 PM foreveryoung has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 90 days)
Posts: 34140
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 281 of 309 (664922)
06-06-2012 3:25 PM
Reply to: Message 264 by foreveryoung
06-06-2012 2:18 PM


What God wrote
And ALL the evidence shows that if God did create the universe She did it at least 14.5 Billion years ago and then waited about 10 Billion years to create the Earth and that man is little more than an after thought.
The Bible though is full of factual errors, fallacies and omissions when it comes to describing 'how' God did it.
Change leaves evidence.
Edited by jar, : fix sub-title.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 264 by foreveryoung, posted 06-06-2012 2:18 PM foreveryoung has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 90 days)
Posts: 34140
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 282 of 309 (664923)
06-06-2012 3:44 PM
Reply to: Message 246 by foreveryoung
06-06-2012 2:55 AM


The rock in the hard place.
foreveryoung writes:
If you dug into the ground and came upon a stone that was dated to be 2 billion years old and on its was engraved the following message, would you not look into to the possibility that the claims made on the story had any basis in reality? The message engraved on the stones said that it was written by the creator of the universe and that the stone was part of the bedrock sitting underneath the soil from which adam, the first human, was created from.
Well, when I stopped laughing, I'd first look at the calendar to see if it was time for yet another "Onyate Man" but then I'd certainly try to figure out how the prankster did it.
It would be a really neat prank though.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 246 by foreveryoung, posted 06-06-2012 2:55 AM foreveryoung has not replied

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 13107
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002


(8)
(1)
Message 283 of 309 (664924)
06-06-2012 3:45 PM
Reply to: Message 269 by foreveryoung
06-06-2012 2:45 PM


ForEverYoung Suspended 1 Month
Hi ForEverYoung,
I'm sorry, this is all just way over the top. See you next month.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 269 by foreveryoung, posted 06-06-2012 2:45 PM foreveryoung has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 284 by foreveryoung, posted 06-06-2012 4:29 PM Admin has seen this message but not replied

  
foreveryoung
Member (Idle past 833 days)
Posts: 921
Joined: 12-26-2011


(1)
(1)
Message 284 of 309 (664925)
06-06-2012 4:29 PM
Reply to: Message 283 by Admin
06-06-2012 3:45 PM


Re: ForEverYoung Suspended 1 Month
What makes you think I want to come back in a month. You can all go to hell. Just keep this crap up and you won't have anyone to talk to but your elitest, conceited selves.
Foreveryoung

This message is a reply to:
 Message 283 by Admin, posted 06-06-2012 3:45 PM Admin has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 285 by Tangle, posted 06-06-2012 5:02 PM foreveryoung has not replied
 Message 286 by 1.61803, posted 06-06-2012 5:43 PM foreveryoung has not replied
 Message 294 by Artemis Entreri, posted 06-07-2012 8:07 AM foreveryoung has not replied

  
Tangle
Member
Posts: 9580
From: UK
Joined: 10-07-2011
Member Rating: 6.6


(6)
Message 285 of 309 (664926)
06-06-2012 5:02 PM
Reply to: Message 284 by foreveryoung
06-06-2012 4:29 PM


Re: ForEverYoung Suspended 1 Month
Foreveryoung writes:
What makes you think I want to come back in a month. You can all go to hell. Just keep this crap up and you won't have anyone to talk to but your elitest, conceited selves.
I think it would be a shame if you didn't return.
My advice would be to take a few days off, then re-read this thread as though you were a spectator rather than a contributer and try to think impartially about the two sides of the argument. (Ignore the rants, sarcasm and taunts and concentrate on the arguments.)
You have shown that you are capable of intelligent, rational thought and you've also shown us an highly frustrated, angry and irrational side of yourself. If you keep talking and reading, you'll eventually find a resolution on one side of the argument or the other and maybe be able to control your conflicts without screaming at everybody.
At the moment you're torn between two contradictory positions - if you keep your head you'll be able to resolve it.
Edited by Tangle, : No reason given.

Life, don't talk to me about life - Marvin the Paranoid Android

This message is a reply to:
 Message 284 by foreveryoung, posted 06-06-2012 4:29 PM foreveryoung has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024