Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 84 (8914 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 06-27-2019 8:51 AM
33 online now:
caffeine, edge, Hyroglyphx, jar, JoeT, kjsimons, Pressie, Tangle (8 members, 25 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: 4petdinos
Upcoming Birthdays: ooh-child
Post Volume:
Total: 854,847 Year: 9,883/19,786 Month: 2,305/2,119 Week: 341/724 Day: 4/62 Hour: 3/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
RewPrev1
...
202122
23
2425Next
Author Topic:   Did Dinosaurs live with man?
Dr Adequate
Member
Posts: 16097
Joined: 07-20-2006


(7)
Message 331 of 373 (698694)
05-08-2013 9:48 PM
Reply to: Message 330 by NoNukes
05-08-2013 8:47 PM


Hydraulic Sorting Moves In Mysterious Ways
Not a single human, or rhino, or elephant, or lion, etc.

Well, y'see, this magical hydrological sorting that couldn't distinguish between sand and mud did know the difference between large quadrupeds with dentary-squamosal jaw joints and large quadrupeds with quadrate-articular jaw joints.

It's jolly bad luck for Faith that the magic water used that particular anatomical criterion --- imagine if it had instead just counted the legs. Or sorted them by size, the way non-magic water does with sediment. But no, it had to decide that the dentary-squamosal jaws got to ride on top.

Pesky magic water, when it wasn't committing genocide it was using its detailed knowledge of tetrapod anatomy to fake the fossil record for the benefit of Darwinists. Tsk.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 330 by NoNukes, posted 05-08-2013 8:47 PM NoNukes has acknowledged this reply

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 332 of 373 (698752)
05-09-2013 10:03 AM
Reply to: Message 327 by Faith
05-08-2013 7:18 PM


"Seriously entertaining?"
I have no doubt whatever that they lived at the same time.

Then you don't know what doubt is.

Edited by Catholic Scientist, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 327 by Faith, posted 05-08-2013 7:18 PM Faith has not yet responded

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 1124 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 333 of 373 (698754)
05-09-2013 10:06 AM
Reply to: Message 327 by Faith
05-08-2013 7:18 PM


"Seriously entertaining?"
I have no doubt whatever that they lived at the same time.

America, folks... leading the world in science and technology.

- Oni


This message is a reply to:
 Message 327 by Faith, posted 05-08-2013 7:18 PM Faith has not yet responded

    
1.61803
Member
Posts: 2841
From: Lone Star State USA
Joined: 02-19-2004
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 334 of 373 (698795)
05-09-2013 3:47 PM
Reply to: Message 306 by PaulK
05-08-2013 8:00 AM


Re: Density of a quackademic skull
deleted

Edited by 1.61803, : wrong post


"You were not there for the beginning. You will not be there for the end. Your knowledge of what is going on can only be superficial and relative" William S. Burroughs

This message is a reply to:
 Message 306 by PaulK, posted 05-08-2013 8:00 AM PaulK has not yet responded

  
1.61803
Member
Posts: 2841
From: Lone Star State USA
Joined: 02-19-2004
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 335 of 373 (698796)
05-09-2013 3:54 PM
Reply to: Message 294 by Faith
05-08-2013 12:36 AM


Re: Density of a quackademic skull
Faith writes:

One thing that needs to be taken into account here is that according to the Bible neither animals nor people were meat-eaters until after the Flood,

Edited by 1.61803, : No reason given.


"You were not there for the beginning. You will not be there for the end. Your knowledge of what is going on can only be superficial and relative" William S. Burroughs

This message is a reply to:
 Message 294 by Faith, posted 05-08-2013 12:36 AM Faith has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 336 by ProtoTypical, posted 05-09-2013 6:36 PM 1.61803 has responded

  
ProtoTypical
Member
Posts: 1792
From: Ontario Canada
Joined: 08-04-2010
Member Rating: 5.8


Message 336 of 373 (698812)
05-09-2013 6:36 PM
Reply to: Message 335 by 1.61803
05-09-2013 3:54 PM


Re: Density of a quackademic skull
I have one of those teeth. It is 6.25 inches long by 4.25 wide and full of tiny little serrations along the edges. Completely useless for salad.

Since we are talking about megalodon teeth. Mine looks like it still has the enamel on the lower portion. Is that possible?


This message is a reply to:
 Message 335 by 1.61803, posted 05-09-2013 3:54 PM 1.61803 has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 337 by New Cat's Eye, posted 05-10-2013 10:09 AM ProtoTypical has acknowledged this reply
 Message 338 by 1.61803, posted 05-10-2013 10:51 AM ProtoTypical has acknowledged this reply

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 337 of 373 (698867)
05-10-2013 10:09 AM
Reply to: Message 336 by ProtoTypical
05-09-2013 6:36 PM


Re: Density of a quackademic skull
Mine looks like it still has the enamel on the lower portion. Is that possible?

I had no idea, so I did some Googlin'... apparently it is:


This message is a reply to:
 Message 336 by ProtoTypical, posted 05-09-2013 6:36 PM ProtoTypical has acknowledged this reply

  
1.61803
Member
Posts: 2841
From: Lone Star State USA
Joined: 02-19-2004
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 338 of 373 (698871)
05-10-2013 10:51 AM
Reply to: Message 336 by ProtoTypical
05-09-2013 6:36 PM


Re: Density of a quackademic skull
Prototypical writes:

I have one of those teeth. It is 6.25 inches long by 4.25 wide and full of tiny little serrations along the edges. Completely useless for salad.

Heh, and obtaining a couple hundred pounds of dino ass.

Here is another preflood herbivore.

Edited by 1.61803, : added Mosasaur skeloton


"You were not there for the beginning. You will not be there for the end. Your knowledge of what is going on can only be superficial and relative" William S. Burroughs

This message is a reply to:
 Message 336 by ProtoTypical, posted 05-09-2013 6:36 PM ProtoTypical has acknowledged this reply

Replies to this message:
 Message 339 by hooah212002, posted 05-10-2013 11:00 AM 1.61803 has acknowledged this reply
 Message 340 by New Cat's Eye, posted 05-10-2013 11:25 AM 1.61803 has responded

  
hooah212002
Member
Posts: 3183
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 339 of 373 (698874)
05-10-2013 11:00 AM
Reply to: Message 338 by 1.61803
05-10-2013 10:51 AM


Re: Density of a quackademic skull
This photograph is evidence that man and dino lived together. It would also appear as though photography has been around for much longer than previously imagined. Good find.

"Science is interesting, and if you don't agree you can fuck off." -Dawkins

This message is a reply to:
 Message 338 by 1.61803, posted 05-10-2013 10:51 AM 1.61803 has acknowledged this reply

Replies to this message:
 Message 341 by New Cat's Eye, posted 05-10-2013 11:28 AM hooah212002 has acknowledged this reply

    
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 340 of 373 (698879)
05-10-2013 11:25 AM
Reply to: Message 338 by 1.61803
05-10-2013 10:51 AM


Re: Density of a quackademic skull
Here is another preflood herbivore.

And obviously, God created these guys:

So they'd have adequate defense against the plants.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 338 by 1.61803, posted 05-10-2013 10:51 AM 1.61803 has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 342 by hooah212002, posted 05-10-2013 11:36 AM New Cat's Eye has responded
 Message 344 by 1.61803, posted 05-10-2013 11:52 AM New Cat's Eye has acknowledged this reply

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 341 of 373 (698880)
05-10-2013 11:28 AM
Reply to: Message 339 by hooah212002
05-10-2013 11:00 AM


Re: Density of a quackademic skull
This photograph is evidence that man and dino lived together. It would also appear as though photography has been around for much longer than previously imagined. Good find.

Heh, that reminds me of this:


This message is a reply to:
 Message 339 by hooah212002, posted 05-10-2013 11:00 AM hooah212002 has acknowledged this reply

  
hooah212002
Member
Posts: 3183
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 342 of 373 (698883)
05-10-2013 11:36 AM
Reply to: Message 340 by New Cat's Eye
05-10-2013 11:25 AM


Re: Density of a quackademic skull
Have YOU tried walking through a nettle plant or a rose bush without a full plate of armor?

"Science is interesting, and if you don't agree you can fuck off." -Dawkins

This message is a reply to:
 Message 340 by New Cat's Eye, posted 05-10-2013 11:25 AM New Cat's Eye has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 343 by New Cat's Eye, posted 05-10-2013 11:48 AM hooah212002 has responded

    
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 343 of 373 (698886)
05-10-2013 11:48 AM
Reply to: Message 342 by hooah212002
05-10-2013 11:36 AM


Bitch I got 6 foot tall blackberries growing in my backyard!
This message is a reply to:
 Message 342 by hooah212002, posted 05-10-2013 11:36 AM hooah212002 has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 345 by hooah212002, posted 05-10-2013 3:12 PM New Cat's Eye has responded
 Message 346 by onifre, posted 05-10-2013 3:18 PM New Cat's Eye has responded

  
1.61803
Member
Posts: 2841
From: Lone Star State USA
Joined: 02-19-2004
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 344 of 373 (698888)
05-10-2013 11:52 AM
Reply to: Message 340 by New Cat's Eye
05-10-2013 11:25 AM


Re: Density of a quackademic skull
I have been to the Museum of Natural History in
NYC. It is full of evolutionist lies and fabricated skeletons.

"You were not there for the beginning. You will not be there for the end. Your knowledge of what is going on can only be superficial and relative" William S. Burroughs

This message is a reply to:
 Message 340 by New Cat's Eye, posted 05-10-2013 11:25 AM New Cat's Eye has acknowledged this reply

  
hooah212002
Member
Posts: 3183
Joined: 08-12-2009


(2)
Message 345 of 373 (698918)
05-10-2013 3:12 PM
Reply to: Message 343 by New Cat's Eye
05-10-2013 11:48 AM


6 foot tall blackberries? That has to be some kind of world record. imagine the blackberry pie that could be made with 6 foot tall blackberries. I can only dream about the size of the birds that come in your backyard to eat these gigantic fruits.

"Science is interesting, and if you don't agree you can fuck off." -Dawkins

This message is a reply to:
 Message 343 by New Cat's Eye, posted 05-10-2013 11:48 AM New Cat's Eye has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 347 by New Cat's Eye, posted 05-10-2013 3:34 PM hooah212002 has responded

    
RewPrev1
...
202122
23
2425Next
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019