In this forum the debate Evolution vs Creationism is reduced to Science vs Religion, which are two different perspectives on life, with different ways of explaining life.
As I understand Percy's (Admin's) intent for this forum, it it Evolution (Science) vs. Creation Science - It is science vs. creationist claims that they have some aspect of science on their side. It is also scientific worldly reality vs. religious beliefs that conflict with that worldly reality (eg. old Earth vs. young Earth).
...The same goes for scripture. It clearly denotes a progression of biology on Earth (evolution),...
Unfortunately, the Genesis story is mighty thin on details, and even then, some of the Genesis sequence is at odds with the scientific evidence.
Evolution viewed through a religious perspective (current understanding) is the result of God's work.
I don't have a grasp of what you've said elsewhere at evcforum.net (frankly, I just haven't paid any attention). But this topic's message 1 leads me to think that you don't have any personal problems with the scientific perspective of old Earth biological evolution. The "result of God's work" perspective could range from deism (God started the universe and then set it free) to some sort of hidden Godly micromanagement (theistic evolution??? / intelligent design???) of the evolutionary (non-biological and/or biological) path.
How it happened, we don't know because no one was there to record it - mystery of God's work.
I have to say "wrong". The processes have left evidences behind. And God hasn't left any obvious fingerprints on those evidences.
Comments?
Adminnemooseus