Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,817 Year: 4,074/9,624 Month: 945/974 Week: 272/286 Day: 33/46 Hour: 5/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Rape victim denied emergency contraception based on religious beliefs of the doctor.
Jazzns
Member (Idle past 3938 days)
Posts: 2657
From: A Better America
Joined: 07-23-2004


Message 8 of 48 (437010)
11-28-2007 1:26 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by StrawberryPatchBug
11-27-2007 9:49 AM


Doctor <= Rapist?
The first thought I had about this is who do you think is the worse victimizer of this poor woman? The doctor or the rapist?
With the rapist, you have someone who is initially recieved as a horrible person doing a horrible act.
With the doctor, you have someone who is expected to be your ally at your time of need doing a horrible act.
What do you think?

Of course, biblical creationists are committed to belief in God's written Word, the Bible, which forbids bearing false witness; --AIG (lest they forget)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by StrawberryPatchBug, posted 11-27-2007 9:49 AM StrawberryPatchBug has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by crashfrog, posted 11-28-2007 1:50 PM Jazzns has not replied

  
Jazzns
Member (Idle past 3938 days)
Posts: 2657
From: A Better America
Joined: 07-23-2004


Message 30 of 48 (437238)
11-29-2007 11:30 AM
Reply to: Message 22 by subbie
11-29-2007 12:51 AM


Re: Where would it end?
Most Islamic cabbies working at the airport in Minneapolis/St. Paul will not take a fare if they know that the person is carrying alcohol.
I don't think this is the same issue because doctors are performing a vital public service that requires them to be licensed to practice. Cabbies and cab companies perform a very nice optional public service, but just as a resturaunt has the right to refuse service to someone who would create a negative experience for the rest of their clients, cabbies should have the right not to carry someone they don't want for a whole host of good reasons.
If there was any regulation about this, it should be from the angle of consumer protection. If you which to exercise your right to refuse service you need to make it explicit (i.e. the signs in some resturants). SO the cabbies could put a sticker on their window saying that they don't provide services for customers carrying alcohol. In some states like Utah it may even simply be an issue of liability. There may be legitimate reasons although certainly it sounds like the Twin Cities cabbies are obviously doing it for religious reasons.
Doctors though should have no recourse for stickers or signs proclaiming their refusal to perscribe certain medications. What then could have happened to this poor woman if she lived in a society where every doctor in a 200 mile radius had such a sign on their door? What if it was a community of JW doctors who refused to give patients blood transfusions?
By the way, Admins need to tell Hoot to STFU about his gay bashing in a thread that is not related whatsoever to homosexuality.
Edited by Jazzns, : No reason given.

Of course, biblical creationists are committed to belief in God's written Word, the Bible, which forbids bearing false witness; --AIG (lest they forget)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by subbie, posted 11-29-2007 12:51 AM subbie has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024