Jon writes:
The notion that a gene can have 'selfish' motives is just ridiculous. Don't be surprised that folks don't think the idea worth consideration.
Yeah - Richard Dawkin's was laughed out of town when he proposed it.
Oh....wait...
Jon writes:
And until you show us the genes that you think are capable of bypassing jar's conscious recollection, he needs no other support than what he's given.
Present your evidence.
Most (all?) of our emotions are subconsciously controlled and these are guided by our genes.
This is not a major revelation.
So, should we think you stupid or disingenuous?
Edited by Panda, : No reason given.
Edited by Panda, : No reason given.
CRYSTALS!!