Human Rights

Riverrat:You cannot have the right to not have intercourse unless you also have the right to intercourse. If you have the to intercourse then you have the right not to have intercourse. Take away one and the other is no longer a right. Neither are seat belts. Just because you do not have the ability to understand does not make your belief override the rights of consenting adults. See consenting adults except the responsibility for what they do, and if terminating an unplanned pregnancy is the decision, then you need to live with it. You must have overlooked this part

quote:

---

Article 12.

​

No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attack

---

Kind of defeats your stance by using this.Edited by alacrity fitzhugh, : No reason given.

---

Look to this day, For yesterday is already a dream. And tomorrow only a vision. But today We lived, makes every Yesterday a dream of Happiness and every tomorrow A vision of hope. Look well there to This day.

Gee, you failed on that one, you have the right to bear arms and the right not to bear arms, the right to vote the right not to vote. By using your right you are accepting the implications of the right. Your logic is that because birth control is not a 100% that eliminates a right. Seat belts are not a 100% . Plus, I'm not using driving as the subject, I'm showing you the error of your logic. As evidence in this thread, many more disagree. Majority rule, right? It is right, and all your histrionics and hand waving will not change that. Not unless they extend rights to life that is not human yet. You quote mine the UN human rights just like you quote mine the constitution. It says No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, comma then the word nor to continue. This falsifies your assertion that (sic)No one is being attacked here... Seeing as how this is part of your defense of your position, show me where it says that, or own up to fact that what you used to start with shows your wrongOne last thing:First you had an abortion? Second, like your the only one. Third, I was present during a late 2nd trimester abortion, that right present, were you present?Edited by alacrity fitzhugh, : No reason given.

---

Look to this day, For yesterday is already a dream. And tomorrow only a vision. But today We lived, makes every Yesterday a dream of Happiness and every tomorrow A vision of hope. Look well there to This day.

And I am pointing out that rights have consequences and consenting adults accept those consequences with they partake of their rights. Bad news, your not killing somebody when you have an abortion, and in the Us you can use your right of arms and use deadly force when your in imminent danger.Edited by alacrity fitzhugh, : No reason given.

---

Look to this day, For yesterday is already a dream. And tomorrow only a vision. But today We lived, makes every Yesterday a dream of Happiness and every tomorrow A vision of hope. Look well there to This day.

Yeah, I agree you have trouble understanding. Again, so you can try to comprehend what I'm writing, I'm not talking about driving. Do try to keep up. And you call this logic? I dare in the same why you dare to use your attempt at using the statement 'many believe the same as I do'. Do not really care how many believe in your jesus, this is about your failure to understand rights. Any time you state 'I feel' or I believe' Your feelings and believes are in no why paramount on others rights. Quote mining again. It was you who brought this up after I pointed out that the document that you used in support of your position does not support your position, ;leave your emotions out of the debate. So you now admit it is none of your business, Good than you know understand the errors of your ways. If you supported it than be an adult and live with it, please don't try saying you are, you've started or participated in to many of these to say otherwise. Your funny, why don't you try and follow your own advice.Edited by alacrity fitzhugh, : No reason given.

---

Look to this day, For yesterday is already a dream. And tomorrow only a vision. But today We lived, makes every Yesterday a dream of Happiness and every tomorrow A vision of hope. Look well there to This day.

Sure, then I'll point out why I said you have trouble understanding. I compared seat belt safety to birth control, you took it as comparing seat belts to sex. If the only way you can debate is to misrepresent other posters then run to admin when they point it out that says about your debating skills. I'm through with you anyway since you show you will not debate in good faith.Edited by alacrity fitzhugh, : No reason given.Edited by alacrity fitzhugh, : No reason given.

---

Look to this day, For yesterday is already a dream. And tomorrow only a vision. But today We lived, makes every Yesterday a dream of Happiness and every tomorrow A vision of hope. Look well there to This day.

Show me where I insulted you, I posted you have trouble understanding. Seeing as how I compared birth control safety to seat belt safety not the act of intercourse, then you took it that I was comparing seat belts to sex is you misunderstanding. No you do not understand, to say I insulted you, then you prove I'm right in the stating you are having trouble understanding You either purposely take peoples positions out of context, or you are having trouble understanding. First, you saying I insulted you does not fly in face of the evidence, second I have been here longer than you and know this little statement
that you made is not for you to decide. You first. You should heed your own words.

---

Look to this day, For yesterday is already a dream. And tomorrow only a vision. But today We lived, makes every Yesterday a dream of Happiness and every tomorrow A vision of hope. Look well there to This day.