For example, I see a lot of atheists sound as if they already know that nothing would happen after death. It's their own faith and without proof.
Wrong answer. The evidence does, indeed, indicate that there is nothing after death. There is NO evidence that there IS anything after physical death. Atheists have no faith in such things: faith is worthless when evidence is readily available. Secondly, "atheists" with any intellectual integrity rarely state they "know" anything concretely. Instead, an atheist would likely state: "there is zero evidence for the claim of an afterlife beyond the odd ramblings of a religious person, therefor, I see no reason to accept this premise as truth or fact
until such time that valid evidence is presented". Try to actually have a conversation with an atheist before putting words in their mouth, would ya?
So do you see where the problem is or do you consider that there's not a problem there?
The problem is: you seem to think you know what atheists think when you clearly don't.
Edited by hooah212002, : No reason given.
"Science is interesting, and if you don't agree you can fuck off." -Dawkins
™ Version 4.2
