|
Author
|
Topic: Peanut Gallery 2012
|
PaulK
Member Posts: 17996 Joined: 01-10-2003 Member Rating: 5.6
|
|
Message 31 of 83 (672181)
09-04-2012 2:26 PM
|
Reply to: Message 30 by Modulous
09-04-2012 2:13 PM
|
|
Re: The Guernica conjecture
I think that you are right about the point RAZD is trying to make. But he would have to provide an argument that there are real supernatural beings behind the myths. I don't think that he can do that, which may be why he is dragging things out.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 30 by Modulous, posted 09-04-2012 2:13 PM | | Modulous has seen this message but not replied |
|
PaulK
Member Posts: 17996 Joined: 01-10-2003 Member Rating: 5.6
|
Re: The Guernica conjecture
The problem with that answer is that it raises the question "what truth" ? If RAZD is merely speculatign that myths point to some other meaning AND that that meaning involves real supernatural beings then he hasn't really got a point. Speculation piled on speculation is a poor way to argue.
|
PaulK
Member Posts: 17996 Joined: 01-10-2003 Member Rating: 5.6
|
|
|
Message 45 of 83 (672762)
09-11-2012 9:13 AM
|
Reply to: Message 43 by onifre
09-11-2012 8:13 AM
|
|
Re: ICANT maybe?
I don't think that at all likely. Their postings are too different.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 43 by onifre, posted 09-11-2012 8:13 AM | | onifre has not replied |
|
PaulK
Member Posts: 17996 Joined: 01-10-2003 Member Rating: 5.6
|
|
|
Message 51 of 83 (672785)
09-11-2012 11:10 AM
|
Reply to: Message 48 by onifre
09-11-2012 10:45 AM
|
|
Re: ICANT maybe?
ICANT had a pretty distinctive writing style and I don't see it in Trou's posts. And that alone is enough for me to say that they are almost certainly different people. Trou (and THAT is how he signs his messages - not "thou") also seems to have quite different interests - fringe physics rather than ICANT's obsession with his own idiosyncratic interpretations of the Bible,
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 48 by onifre, posted 09-11-2012 10:45 AM | | onifre has seen this message but not replied |
|
™ Version 4.2