Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 78 (8896 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 03-23-2019 8:40 PM
38 online now:
Tanypteryx (1 member, 37 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: WookieeB
Post Volume:
Total: 848,599 Year: 3,636/19,786 Month: 631/1,087 Week: 221/212 Day: 36/27 Hour: 0/1

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   New Human Fossils found
Posts: 19758
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004
Member Rating: 5.7

Message 31 of 31 (670732)
08-17-2012 7:47 PM
Reply to: Message 29 by sayak83
08-16-2012 3:26 PM

Hi sayak83, and welcome to the fray

... The paper itself will be able to tell you why they classified it as a distict species. Somebody had the pdf and offered to share I believe.

See Message 3 by Coragyps:

As always, I can email the pdf of Nature's paper to anyone as geeky as I am about reading that stuff.


... as you are new here, some posting tips:

type [qs]quotes are easy[/qs] and it becomes:

quotes are easy

or type [quote]quotes are easy[/quote] and it becomes:

quotes are easy

also check out (help) links on any formatting questions when in the reply window.

For other formatting tips see Posting Tips
For a quick overview see EvC Forum Primer
If you have problems with replies see Report Discussion Problems Here 3.0

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
Rebel American Zen Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.

Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by sayak83, posted 08-16-2012 3:26 PM sayak83 has not yet responded

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019