Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 85 (8924 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 08-17-2019 11:01 PM
23 online now:
Minnemooseus (Adminnemooseus) (1 member, 22 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: Jedothek
Post Volume:
Total: 859,867 Year: 14,903/19,786 Month: 1,626/3,058 Week: 404/868 Day: 43/70 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The $5,000,000 ID Research Challenge
MrIntelligentDesign
Junior Member (Idle past 1309 days)
Posts: 12
Joined: 09-21-2015


Message 266 of 285 (769536)
09-21-2015 11:57 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Taq
08-30-2012 12:39 PM


quote:
Some people claim that ID researchers are ignored and persecuted, the result of which is that ID researchers can not get research money to study ID.

So what if they did get $5,000,000 to spend on a new research facility? What would they spend it on? That is the challenge for this thread. Show us what the ID research program would actually need to do, what equipment would be needed to do this research, and how you would prioritize the money in this laboratory. Show us what a real ID research program would look like.

Now mind you, this money is not to be spent testing evolution. It is meant to study ID, not evolution. Any experiments that test evolution will not meet the guidelines set out in the challenge.


Oh please, I need that amount to:

1. Re-edit all my science books about the new Intelligent Design for correct grammars. The science is great but not the grammars. Currently, the new Intelligent Design had published these 5 science books in Amazon as e-books and the combined pages will become 800 pages. There one is coming titled "PEER-REVIEW and the new Intelligent Design: a documentary". There are three more coming and there are more researches to be done and be published, thus the total pages will be 2000 pages.

2000 pages per 20 US dollars each = 40,000 US dollars.

2. I will use that amount to research the replacement for Biological Evolution (ToE). The replacement is called Biological Interrelation, BiTs. I will be needing US 1,500,000 to research the best implications of BiTs to humans' engineering and technology. Of course, ToE has no place.

3. I will be needing the amount to research and fund a new math for Certainty Principle (CP) in lieu of Uncertainty Principle (UP) since the new predicts that UP is wrong. I need US 1.5 million to nail that topic. Also, I need another 1.0 mil USD to research the predicted possible equation or math for the Theory of Everything (TOE) since the new predicts it too.

4. I will need USD 2.0 million to use that in Psychology especially in Cognitive Psychology to revolutionize the whole field. WE ARE TOTALLY WRONG in Psychology!

5. I need the remaining amount to give more seminars to universities around the world to share the new discoveries in science from the new Intelligent Design .

Thus, give me that amount please...


This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Taq, posted 08-30-2012 12:39 PM Taq has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 267 by Coyote, posted 09-22-2015 12:11 AM MrIntelligentDesign has responded
 Message 268 by Dr Adequate, posted 09-22-2015 1:00 AM MrIntelligentDesign has responded
 Message 271 by Pressie, posted 09-22-2015 6:59 AM MrIntelligentDesign has not yet responded
 Message 276 by Blue Jay, posted 09-22-2015 11:37 AM MrIntelligentDesign has responded

    
MrIntelligentDesign
Junior Member (Idle past 1309 days)
Posts: 12
Joined: 09-21-2015


Message 269 of 285 (769540)
09-22-2015 3:20 AM
Reply to: Message 267 by Coyote
09-22-2015 12:11 AM


Re: Nonsense
Yes, we need real science and we can make new category in Nobel Prize since it will give more inspirations to many young scientists.

Yes, as of today, those science books are self-published. If you complain about science, you can easily smash them out IF YOU CAN.

You had never read those science books that is why you still don't know what you are fighting for..

BUT, give me that amount and I will tell you that your beloved ToE will surely be kicked out since I've already replacement...

BUT there are more about my new discoveries...

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nothing makes sense in science except in the light of Intelligent Design . So, interrelation is unproved and un-provable. We believe it only because the only alternative is evolution, and that is unthinkable.

Edited by MrIntelligentDesign, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 267 by Coyote, posted 09-22-2015 12:11 AM Coyote has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 272 by RAZD, posted 09-22-2015 7:44 AM MrIntelligentDesign has responded

    
MrIntelligentDesign
Junior Member (Idle past 1309 days)
Posts: 12
Joined: 09-21-2015


Message 270 of 285 (769541)
09-22-2015 3:23 AM
Reply to: Message 268 by Dr Adequate
09-22-2015 1:00 AM


Why you ask? Do you have that amount???

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nothing makes sense in science except in the light of Intelligent Design . So, interrelation is unproved and un-provable. We believe it only because the only alternative is evolution, and that is unthinkable.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 268 by Dr Adequate, posted 09-22-2015 1:00 AM Dr Adequate has not yet responded

    
MrIntelligentDesign
Junior Member (Idle past 1309 days)
Posts: 12
Joined: 09-21-2015


Message 273 of 285 (769556)
09-22-2015 10:17 AM
Reply to: Message 272 by RAZD
09-22-2015 7:44 AM


Re: No science yet ...
Thank you for your help, RAZD. Thank you too for your tips. I think that I've already PROPOSED a new thread so that anybody who is willing to discuss with the real and new Intelligent Design could join.

TAKE NOTE: that your ideal science flow is not applicable to me. I always think that we are in Galileo's time. I don't know if you understand it. If not, I will clarify to you.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 272 by RAZD, posted 09-22-2015 7:44 AM RAZD has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 274 by jar, posted 09-22-2015 10:36 AM MrIntelligentDesign has responded
 Message 275 by RAZD, posted 09-22-2015 10:58 AM MrIntelligentDesign has responded

    
MrIntelligentDesign
Junior Member (Idle past 1309 days)
Posts: 12
Joined: 09-21-2015


Message 278 of 285 (769590)
09-22-2015 5:17 PM
Reply to: Message 274 by jar
09-22-2015 10:36 AM


Re: No science yet ...
jar writes:

And that is why you have failed even before you begin and rightfully your nonsense just gets tossed into the trash.

You must ask me to clarify before you post.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 274 by jar, posted 09-22-2015 10:36 AM jar has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 284 by herebedragons, posted 09-22-2015 7:10 PM MrIntelligentDesign has not yet responded

    
MrIntelligentDesign
Junior Member (Idle past 1309 days)
Posts: 12
Joined: 09-21-2015


Message 279 of 285 (769591)
09-22-2015 5:25 PM
Reply to: Message 275 by RAZD
09-22-2015 10:58 AM


Re: No science yet ... not Galileo either ...
RAZD writes:

Actually it does if you are claiming to do science: that's the rules of modern science.


It was not I who broke that rules but those peer-reviewers. When they broke the rules, are the not breaking the rules?

Except that we aren't. One of the curious thing about quacks is that they like to compare themselves to Galileo ... it's almost like a litmus test.

You knew, ToE had been around for 160 years now...It is long and ToE should have covered all topics for that life span of ToE and should have every experiments and observations to counter all QUACKS or CRACKPOTS that you think they are. In my new discoveries alone, I covered the topics of Biology, Physics, Psychology, Philosophy and even religion! I've even write science books and publish them! How about ToE?

But in my case alone, I claimed and said that I discovered the real intelligence. Many ToE's supporters told me that I am wrong but when I asked them to show me an experiment to show that their knowledge of intelligence is universal and scientific, they could not answer. HOW COME???

In science, the only way to silence any QUACKS or CRACKPOTS is to make one experiment from ToE to explain that ToE's stance is right. Besides, ToE uses taxes and grants from people.

Edited by MrIntelligentDesign, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 275 by RAZD, posted 09-22-2015 10:58 AM RAZD has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 285 by RAZD, posted 09-22-2015 8:11 PM MrIntelligentDesign has not yet responded

    
MrIntelligentDesign
Junior Member (Idle past 1309 days)
Posts: 12
Joined: 09-21-2015


Message 280 of 285 (769592)
09-22-2015 5:30 PM
Reply to: Message 276 by Blue Jay
09-22-2015 11:37 AM


Blue Jay writes:

I hope this "new math" you plan to develop will also show us how you can cover $6,040,000 (+ "remaining amount") of research expenses with a $5,000,000 grant.

I can cut some funds to other topic, besides, I did the BEST science with less amount of money and I even published science books!

Thus, if that amount is given to me, I can do better than everybody...

But sad to say, ToE's usage of taxes and grants had made the world a dumber and darker way...


This message is a reply to:
 Message 276 by Blue Jay, posted 09-22-2015 11:37 AM Blue Jay has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 281 by Coragyps, posted 09-22-2015 6:21 PM MrIntelligentDesign has responded

    
MrIntelligentDesign
Junior Member (Idle past 1309 days)
Posts: 12
Joined: 09-21-2015


Message 282 of 285 (769597)
09-22-2015 6:51 PM
Reply to: Message 281 by Coragyps
09-22-2015 6:21 PM


Coragyps writes:

Mr I D - you might want to go meet ScottRP over at the Chariots of God thread in the Bible Study forum. You two may have more in common than it first appears.

Just a suggestion...


LOL!

I have science, real science...I don't know about him...


This message is a reply to:
 Message 281 by Coragyps, posted 09-22-2015 6:21 PM Coragyps has not yet responded

    
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019