Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9071 total)
62 online now:
PaulK, Percy (Admin), vimesey (3 members, 59 visitors)
Newest Member: FossilDiscovery
Upcoming Birthdays: Percy
Post Volume: Total: 893,040 Year: 4,152/6,534 Month: 366/900 Week: 72/150 Day: 3/42 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Solar flares affect radiometric decay rates?
OS
Member (Idle past 2499 days)
Posts: 67
Joined: 06-22-2014


Message 30 of 67 (732373)
07-07-2014 12:14 AM


I would suspect it to be true, if there were a lot of positrons involved interfering with equipment. But the Solis has negatively polarized charges of photons. Unless lasers affect radioactivity, the article seems to be total BS.

Edited by OS, : No reason given.


Replies to this message:
 Message 31 by NoNukes, posted 07-07-2014 12:44 AM OS has taken no action

  
OS
Member (Idle past 2499 days)
Posts: 67
Joined: 06-22-2014


Message 32 of 67 (732378)
07-07-2014 3:02 AM


I will stick with my 11e University Physics with Modern Physics by Young and Freeman. Though the text you are using doesn't look watered down.

Replies to this message:
 Message 33 by NoNukes, posted 07-07-2014 5:24 AM OS has taken no action

  
OS
Member (Idle past 2499 days)
Posts: 67
Joined: 06-22-2014


Message 34 of 67 (732384)
07-07-2014 7:15 AM


What does it say about "charges of photons"? or negative polarization of such?
It says nothing other than the standard photoelectric effect. Photons could have been photoelectrons; but I think of photons as cycles of charge, but they are overall, negative. This can seen by how a laser pulls hot metal away instead of pushing it around. So-called "Positive" polarization would be invisible to the onlooker. In effect, anything electron/positron related tends to produce repelling magnetics and radioactivity.

Edited by OS, : No reason given.


Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by NoNukes, posted 07-07-2014 9:03 AM OS has taken no action
 Message 36 by Percy, posted 07-07-2014 3:25 PM OS has taken no action

  
OS
Member (Idle past 2499 days)
Posts: 67
Joined: 06-22-2014


Message 38 of 67 (732463)
07-07-2014 4:58 PM
Reply to: Message 37 by NoNukes
07-07-2014 4:34 PM


the metal has a combination of negative and positive charges, but the light beam pulls the metal using a negative charge.

Edited by OS, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by NoNukes, posted 07-07-2014 4:34 PM NoNukes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 39 by Coragyps, posted 07-07-2014 5:45 PM OS has replied
 Message 40 by NoNukes, posted 07-08-2014 12:44 AM OS has taken no action
 Message 46 by PurpleYouko, posted 07-11-2014 9:44 AM OS has replied

  
OS
Member (Idle past 2499 days)
Posts: 67
Joined: 06-22-2014


Message 41 of 67 (732757)
07-10-2014 3:57 PM
Reply to: Message 39 by Coragyps
07-07-2014 5:45 PM


I didn't say it was electricity. But to say negative charges repel is bullshit. Negative charges hold the universe together, and prevent positively charged electrons from repelling each other too much.

Edited by OS, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by Coragyps, posted 07-07-2014 5:45 PM Coragyps has taken no action

Replies to this message:
 Message 45 by Percy, posted 07-11-2014 9:02 AM OS has taken no action
 Message 47 by ringo, posted 07-11-2014 12:51 PM OS has replied
 Message 48 by Diomedes, posted 07-11-2014 1:50 PM OS has taken no action

  
OS
Member (Idle past 2499 days)
Posts: 67
Joined: 06-22-2014


(1)
Message 50 of 67 (732840)
07-11-2014 4:12 PM
Reply to: Message 47 by ringo
07-11-2014 12:51 PM


It is an unusual hypothesis/theory of the standard model. I should have kept my mouth shut.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by ringo, posted 07-11-2014 12:51 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 56 by ringo, posted 07-12-2014 11:40 AM OS has taken no action

  
OS
Member (Idle past 2499 days)
Posts: 67
Joined: 06-22-2014


Message 51 of 67 (732841)
07-11-2014 4:14 PM
Reply to: Message 49 by NoNukes
07-11-2014 2:38 PM


Re: Don't feed the troll
The electrons are actually holes for subprotons, while positrons are actually common electrons. The thing would be that electrons would start at the positive end, and the nucleus holes do all the work.

Edited by OS, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by NoNukes, posted 07-11-2014 2:38 PM NoNukes has taken no action

Replies to this message:
 Message 53 by New Cat's Eye, posted 07-11-2014 4:49 PM OS has replied

  
OS
Member (Idle past 2499 days)
Posts: 67
Joined: 06-22-2014


Message 52 of 67 (732842)
07-11-2014 4:16 PM
Reply to: Message 46 by PurpleYouko
07-11-2014 9:44 AM


DELETED

Edited by OS, : No reason given.

Edited by OS, : The question was not worth it.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by PurpleYouko, posted 07-11-2014 9:44 AM PurpleYouko has taken no action

  
OS
Member (Idle past 2499 days)
Posts: 67
Joined: 06-22-2014


Message 55 of 67 (732875)
07-11-2014 9:07 PM
Reply to: Message 53 by New Cat's Eye
07-11-2014 4:49 PM


Re: Don't feed the troll
Perhaps, you should visit the site by yourself.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by New Cat's Eye, posted 07-11-2014 4:49 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 57 by New Cat's Eye, posted 07-12-2014 12:01 PM OS has taken no action

  
OS
Member (Idle past 2499 days)
Posts: 67
Joined: 06-22-2014


Message 60 of 67 (733682)
07-20-2014 9:59 AM
Reply to: Message 59 by New Cat's Eye
07-14-2014 10:10 AM


Re: Don't feed the troll
No, fuck yourself. You didn't even watch your language.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by New Cat's Eye, posted 07-14-2014 10:10 AM New Cat's Eye has taken no action

Replies to this message:
 Message 61 by Pressie, posted 07-21-2014 7:05 AM OS has replied

  
OS
Member (Idle past 2499 days)
Posts: 67
Joined: 06-22-2014


Message 62 of 67 (733786)
07-21-2014 8:54 AM
Reply to: Message 61 by Pressie
07-21-2014 7:05 AM


So I guess profanity is appropriate for this forum.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by Pressie, posted 07-21-2014 7:05 AM Pressie has taken no action

Replies to this message:
 Message 63 by Admin, posted 07-21-2014 9:41 AM OS has taken no action
 Message 64 by Larni, posted 07-21-2014 11:36 AM OS has taken no action
 Message 65 by RAZD, posted 07-22-2014 9:39 AM OS has taken no action

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022