Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,342 Year: 3,599/9,624 Month: 470/974 Week: 83/276 Day: 11/23 Hour: 5/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Please help me identify this spider
Blue Jay
Member (Idle past 2716 days)
Posts: 2843
From: You couldn't pronounce it with your mouthparts
Joined: 02-04-2008


(1)
Message 16 of 18 (673139)
09-14-2012 1:33 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by arachnophilia
09-13-2012 9:48 PM


Hi, arachnophilia.
arachnophilia writes:
how come the answer to "what's this spider?" is always "orb weaver"?
I don't usually get a lot of people asking about orb weavers: usually, it's a wolf spider or agelenid funnel weaver that somebody thought was a brown recluse, because it's brown.
But, orb weavers are usually highly visible (because they build big, spiral webs up in open air where people can see them), and they are often brightly colored and/or oddly shaped. So, they tend to arouse more curiosity than other spiders.

-Bluejay (a.k.a. Mantis, Thylacosmilus)
Darwin loves you.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by arachnophilia, posted 09-13-2012 9:48 PM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by arachnophilia, posted 09-15-2012 3:50 AM Blue Jay has not replied

  
arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1362 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 17 of 18 (673174)
09-15-2012 3:50 AM
Reply to: Message 16 by Blue Jay
09-14-2012 1:33 PM


over on reddit, they were joking about putting the identification of the golden orb weaver in the title bar of /r/spiders so people would stop asking about it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by Blue Jay, posted 09-14-2012 1:33 PM Blue Jay has not replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 182 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 18 of 18 (673195)
09-16-2012 7:42 AM


I was going to say a orb spider, too. The pattern on the abdomen gives it way.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024