Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,824 Year: 4,081/9,624 Month: 952/974 Week: 279/286 Day: 0/40 Hour: 0/0


EvC Forum ⇒ Social and Religious Issues ⇒ Social Issues and Creation/Evolution ⇒

Immorality of Homosexuality

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Immorality of Homosexuality
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005

Normal Thread Display
Message 7 of 218 (395843)
04-18-2007 3:28 AM 		Reply to: Message 1 by Nuggin
04-17-2007 5:36 PM

It's not immoral at all.
​
But it can trigger a sense of revulsion in some people.
​
I would say some people register this feeling and seek to justify it in their heads in any which way they can.
​
Another example of people not thinking with their brains.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Nuggin, posted 04-17-2007 5:36 PM Nuggin has not replied
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005

Normal Thread Display
Message 103 of 218 (423319)
09-21-2007 8:14 AM 		Reply to: Message 102 by Greatest I am
09-21-2007 7:27 AM

Re: Calling Out Nemesis Juggernaut
Yeah, I don't see why anyone would hold homosexuality and bestiality in anyway similar.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 102 by Greatest I am, posted 09-21-2007 7:27 AM Greatest I am has not replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 104 by Taz, posted 09-21-2007 12:48 PM Larni has replied
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005

Normal Thread Display
Message 107 of 218 (423407)
09-21-2007 9:08 PM 		Reply to: Message 104 by Taz
09-21-2007 12:48 PM

Re: Calling Out Nemesis Juggernaut
Yeah, I see your point about the position Nem holds; it is an undefendable position that Nem holds.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 104 by Taz, posted 09-21-2007 12:48 PM Taz has not replied
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005

Normal Thread Display
Message 110 of 218 (423626)
09-23-2007 10:48 AM 		Reply to: Message 108 by Hyroglyphx
09-22-2007 3:53 PM

Re: Calling Out Nemesis Juggernaut
Nem writes:
​
And now you are telling me that consent is some kind of untouchable quality to determine the morality of something. But you forget the fact that you don't ask a cow, "pretty please, with sugar on top, can I slaughter you and your flesh?" So why would you ask their permission to have sex with them by the same premise?
​
Answer: Obviously consent isn't the sole qualifier of such things.
​
Weapons grade bullshit.
​
How can you compare beastiality with two consenting humans having sex?
This message is a reply to:
 Message 108 by Hyroglyphx, posted 09-22-2007 3:53 PM Hyroglyphx has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 113 by Hyroglyphx, posted 09-23-2007 12:56 PM Larni has replied
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005

Normal Thread Display
Message 119 of 218 (423737)
09-24-2007 6:31 AM 		Reply to: Message 113 by Hyroglyphx
09-23-2007 12:56 PM

Re: Calling Out Nemesis Juggernaut
Ringo writes:
​
In order to make the comparison to homosexual love valid, you have to show that same-sex love is different from opposite-sex love, that the relationship is inherently unequal.
​
Ringo said it better than I did: You have to show that same sex and opposite love are different.
​
So far I see no evidence of that position.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 113 by Hyroglyphx, posted 09-23-2007 12:56 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005

Normal Thread Display
Message 146 of 218 (424007)
09-25-2007 5:20 AM 		Reply to: Message 132 by Ihategod
09-24-2007 6:35 PM

Damn double post!
​
Edited by Larni, : No reason given.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 132 by Ihategod, posted 09-24-2007 6:35 PM Ihategod has not replied
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005

Normal Thread Display
Message 147 of 218 (424008)
09-25-2007 5:21 AM 		Reply to: Message 132 by Ihategod
09-24-2007 6:35 PM

Ihategod writes:
​
Also, this brings up a psychological musing. If you look at gay couples, there will, as far as I have seen and I go out to the gay clubs and bars sometimes with my gay friends, there is a masculine and a effeminate with men. Doesn't this suggest psychological inadequacy?
​
No: it suggests that different people are different.
​
Pop-psychological musings are pretty poor evidence for a theory.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 132 by Ihategod, posted 09-24-2007 6:35 PM Ihategod has not replied
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024