Conservapedia declares victory over EvC Forum

Gee percy, h0w's about we add up the duration of all those little suspensions that you apply so fairly.Let's see:All evolutionists suspensions added up equals to 26 days and 4 hours.andAll creationists suspensions add up to-1 month plus 6 weeks plus 13 days, plus two indefinitely! Oh and let's not forget, I am suspended indefinitely from the biology forums and buzz is suspended indefinitely from science forums, and I am probably missing some other hidden suspensions.Oh, and since creationists make up a tiny portion of all the posters on your site, that pretty much blows your whole attempt to even try to compare the suspensions of creationists to evolutionists to smithereens. Its not even close Percy.Do you have cognitive dissonance?

Buzz is not indefinitely suspended, he will be allowed back in to the science forums as soon as he can agree with other members here what constitutes evidence. The fact that he hasn't seriously attempted that yet and thus has not yet been reinstated, is not Percy's fault.

I looked up why you lost your posting permissions in the Biological Evolution forum, and apparently Message 305 was the last straw: As I recall, you were at the time trying to raise moderation issues in science threads, and by the time I removed your permissions in the Biological Evolution forum you had already done this in several other threads. I restored your permissions some time ago.There are a couple places where one may raise moderation issues. One is the Report Discussion Problems Here 3.0 thread where you can report discussion issues, and the other is an unmoderated thread where moderation issues can be discussed at length, General Discussion Of Moderation Procedures (aka 'The Whine List'). If you keep your posts mostly on-topic in the science and religion threads then moderators will have little cause to modify your permissions or issue temporary suspensions.Each member has a list of censored words. For most members this list is empty, but apparently you were too free in your use of some words while being personal and uncivil to other members, and so they were added to your list. At the present time it contains these words and their close relatives: You are not the only member with a non-empty censored word list. For example, Jar also has a non-null list.--PercyEdited by Percy, : Grammar.

All very nice Christian words too.

I am almost tempted to take up their challenge, just for the thrill of it, but then again it would be a total waste of time.

So, he's now made three posts about the forum which is so tiny and insignificant that he can't be bothered to tell the truth about it.What does this remind me of? Ah yes, science itself. Creationists are obsessed with it, they can't stop talking about it, but they haven't the faintest interest in whether what they're saying about it is true.

Conservapedia haz big luvs! Pullz our pigtailz!

Those were my questions. I went on to make these posts as well but they have apparently been rejected. I made this one early this morning.

quote:

---

15 questions for evolutionists says,

​

"1. I certainly don't want to wrangle with an evolutionist and/or atheist denialist."

​

And then,

​

"3. Your refusal to accept our generous debate offer which would air your evolutionist views to tens of thousands of people is very telling."

​

Well which is it? Do you want to discuss it or not?

​

Much more telling is this little exchange above. A creationist makes a claim and has it shown to be wrong and then refuses to engage the evidence. This is not how an honest person debates an issue. An honest person looks for the truth wherever it may be.

​

I admonish you by referring to Proverbs 12:22 (you will find it in the Bible).

---

And this one a couple of hours ago.

quote:

---

What is the matter? Did my post not meet with your approval?

​

How can you complain about censorship and then conduct your own discussion with such disregard for the free exchange of ideas and opinions? What is that verse about the log in your own eye?

​

You should go to EvC where people can speak freely and all the facts are on the table. I encourage you by referring to Proverbs 16:8.

---

----- True enough but when a pig walks up onto your porch you should kick it in the ass on it's way back down.I am posting this to make it even more abundantly clear how much of a hypocrite this guy is.

More of the same ranting here. For a website on its deathbed, EvC sure does attract a lot of attention.Question Evolution!: The hamsters of evolutionary belief spin wildly on their wheels, but they are going nowhereI looked around on this guy's website, and it seems that actually not one single post is devoted to showing why evolution is wrong, or why creation should be true. It is all about getting people to vote for creationism, no matter how.

Wow. The Question Evolution folks are just plain old liars. Propaganda at its finest.This whole thing is just facinating. What is wrong with people?

Most of them are idiots.

I think the Creationist Bible stops after the Flood. The rest of the Old Testament isn't much fun.

The mention of Haekel made me think. Is it randman by any chance?

Yeah, there's that stuff about not bearing false witness.