About New Lamarckian Synthesis Theory

Hi dayalanand roy, and welcome to the fray.I read your two proposed posts first and then followed you to this thread. You seem to have a common problem in all three posts so far: reliance on feeling or opinion rather than evidence and the scientific method. And yet we see Bonobos ("Pygmy" Chimpanzees) walking erect, and there are observations of other primates walking erect.When we look at the stresses this posture puts on the human skeleton and muscles, we also see that this has been adapted to upright posture rather than designed for it: it is not a good design.Curiously, what your conscience can accept or not is totally irrelevant to what actually occurs, and your conscience or opinions are stunningly incapable of altering reality. The "efforts of humans themselves" in taking an upright posture is part of the natural selection of that behavior, so this had a lot to do with it. This is confused thinking -- mutations do not turn up because they are needed or could be useful. Nor does the appearance of a mutation in one species mean that it should occur in any other species: that would in fact be quite an extraordinary event. Or this example suggests one should learn what evolution actually involves. Curiously, it amply demonstrated that physical characteristics acquired during life are not passed on by heredity. If you can think of some way for a trait to be developed by an organism during its life to be passed on by heredity, please elucidate.Enjoy