Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 87 (8927 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 08-23-2019 9:48 AM
30 online now:
Faith, JonF, PurpleYouko, RAZD (4 members, 26 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: Jedothek
Post Volume:
Total: 860,269 Year: 15,305/19,786 Month: 2,028/3,058 Week: 402/404 Day: 6/63 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Simplest Protein of Life
Dr Adequate
Member
Posts: 16097
Joined: 07-20-2006


(5)
Message 3 of 281 (674636)
10-01-2012 10:27 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by BoredomSetsIn
10-01-2012 9:00 AM


To conclude, I think the chances of a living cell forming from chemicals that just happened to bond, is ridiculously unlikely.

And every biologist in the world agrees with you. That is indeed not how living cells are produced: the chemicals don't "just happen to bond". Well done.

Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by BoredomSetsIn, posted 10-01-2012 9:00 AM BoredomSetsIn has not yet responded

  
Dr Adequate
Member
Posts: 16097
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 17 of 281 (674789)
10-03-2012 1:17 AM
Reply to: Message 6 by BoredomSetsIn
10-02-2012 6:33 AM


When did I ever say this has to do with evolution??

You didn't. Which is kind of like discussing the origin of cheese without mentioning milk.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by BoredomSetsIn, posted 10-02-2012 6:33 AM BoredomSetsIn has not yet responded

  
Dr Adequate
Member
Posts: 16097
Joined: 07-20-2006


(4)
Message 23 of 281 (674905)
10-04-2012 3:19 AM
Reply to: Message 22 by zaius137
10-04-2012 2:47 AM


The common way evolutionists minimize the problems of forming a protein ex nihilo ...

... is to point out that no evolutionist believes that that is what happened.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by zaius137, posted 10-04-2012 2:47 AM zaius137 has not yet responded

  
Dr Adequate
Member
Posts: 16097
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 25 of 281 (674964)
10-04-2012 4:14 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by dwise1
10-04-2012 3:12 PM


It is the creationists who know how proteins actually form and yet who concoct and disseminate these ludicrous probability claims who are the liars ...

That may however constitute an empty set.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by dwise1, posted 10-04-2012 3:12 PM dwise1 has not yet responded

  
Dr Adequate
Member
Posts: 16097
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 68 of 281 (675761)
10-15-2012 3:02 PM
Reply to: Message 67 by Alfred Maddenstein
10-15-2012 2:50 PM


Re: Your case is lost...
So you're a crackpot about biology too? I might have guessed. In fact, I did. When I saw that you'd posted on this thread, I thought to myself: "A.M. will once again have degraded himself by drooling out stupid nonsense in public". And I was right. I must confess, I didn't guess just how stupid it would be.

Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 67 by Alfred Maddenstein, posted 10-15-2012 2:50 PM Alfred Maddenstein has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 72 by Alfred Maddenstein, posted 10-15-2012 3:56 PM Dr Adequate has responded

  
Dr Adequate
Member
Posts: 16097
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 79 of 281 (675776)
10-15-2012 5:52 PM
Reply to: Message 72 by Alfred Maddenstein
10-15-2012 3:56 PM


Re: Your case is lost...
Was that intended to mean anything, and if so was it related in any way to the topic?
This message is a reply to:
 Message 72 by Alfred Maddenstein, posted 10-15-2012 3:56 PM Alfred Maddenstein has not yet responded

  
Dr Adequate
Member
Posts: 16097
Joined: 07-20-2006


(3)
Message 120 of 281 (675978)
10-18-2012 3:30 AM
Reply to: Message 119 by Alfred Maddenstein
10-17-2012 11:00 PM


Counterpoint The Surrealism Of The Underlying Metaphor
If you want a more extensive argument why water may be degrading to a memory arising from oblivion ...

Good grief.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 119 by Alfred Maddenstein, posted 10-17-2012 11:00 PM Alfred Maddenstein has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 121 by Tangle, posted 10-18-2012 3:38 AM Dr Adequate has not yet responded

  
Dr Adequate
Member
Posts: 16097
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 127 of 281 (676062)
10-18-2012 6:02 PM
Reply to: Message 126 by Alfred Maddenstein
10-18-2012 5:47 PM


Re: Your case is lost...
What is exactly the simplest possible chemical and mechanical configuration that is that limit?

Perhaps you could answer that question.

Oh, wait, no you can't.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 126 by Alfred Maddenstein, posted 10-18-2012 5:47 PM Alfred Maddenstein has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 141 by Alfred Maddenstein, posted 10-19-2012 8:51 PM Dr Adequate has not yet responded

  
Dr Adequate
Member
Posts: 16097
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 131 of 281 (676067)
10-18-2012 9:05 PM
Reply to: Message 130 by Alfred Maddenstein
10-18-2012 8:03 PM


Re: Your case is lost...
Sorry, Gyps, you might not be aware of that but in the meantime the relativity has been high-jacked by the bigbangism that restored back the naive idea of the universal calendar and is creationist geocentrism in disguise.

This may possibly be the stupidest single sentence ever written.

Should we congratulate you?


This message is a reply to:
 Message 130 by Alfred Maddenstein, posted 10-18-2012 8:03 PM Alfred Maddenstein has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 132 by Alfred Maddenstein, posted 10-18-2012 9:45 PM Dr Adequate has not yet responded

  
Dr Adequate
Member
Posts: 16097
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 275 of 281 (725149)
04-24-2014 1:44 PM
Reply to: Message 263 by Ed67
04-24-2014 11:16 AM


Re: God of the Gaps Fallacy
And the whining "God of the Gaps" is not an argument. It shows that you have been presented with a situation that can best be explained by positing a creator. When Darwinists have no response, they whine "You used God-Of-The-Gaps"

So, we'll add the phrase "God of the Gaps" to the list of things you don't understand, then.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 263 by Ed67, posted 04-24-2014 11:16 AM Ed67 has not yet responded

  
Dr Adequate
Member
Posts: 16097
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 276 of 281 (725150)
04-24-2014 1:46 PM
Reply to: Message 268 by Ed67
04-24-2014 11:43 AM


Re: One Fell Swoop? Why not?
You mean, that's not how Darwinists believe EVOLUTION works, so they blithely dismiss the possibility without more thought.

It's the FAITH STATEMENT that 'everything came about by some form of evolutionary process' that blinds Darwinists to the possibility of life being created in 'one fell swoop'.

However, in view of the evidence, I submit that 'one fell swoop' is an inference to the best explanation for life's origin.

Have you actually hit your head on something? Should we be concerned?

You do seem unable to follow the simplest argument. Whatever the etiology of this defect, this should concern you.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 268 by Ed67, posted 04-24-2014 11:43 AM Ed67 has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019