EvC Forum: Civilized man was killed by a bullet from a pistol in the age of dinosaurs

Email This Thread

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Author

Topic: Civilized man was killed by a bullet from a pistol in the age of dinosaurs

New Cat's Eye

Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display

Message 6 of 89 (674790)
10-03-2012 1:29 AM

Reply to: Message 1 by valentin.d
10-02-2012 7:35 PM

Okay, I've been too busy working in the lab to properly respond to people who have been responding to me. But lets have a go at this one...

Civilized man was killed by a bullet from a pistol in the age of dinosaurs

Okay.

The killer shot him in the forehead, and the bullet came out of the head in the back of the head. At first, he was severely beaten, and then followed by a shot in the head and in the end he was beheaded.

Gotcha.

Here are documentary photos:

Rad.

Assuming everything you've said is true:

Now what?

Where there guns so long ago or was there never a so long ago because of the guns? What's your point?

This message is a reply to:
	Message 1 by valentin.d, posted 10-02-2012 7:35 PM		valentin.d has replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 7 by valentin.d, posted 10-03-2012 7:00 AM		New Cat's Eye has replied

New Cat's Eye

Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display

Message 9 of 89 (674819)
10-03-2012 9:59 AM

Reply to: Message 7 by valentin.d
10-03-2012 7:00 AM

Catholic Scientist
Assuming everything you've said is true:

Now what?

Where there guns so long ago or was there never a so long ago because of the guns? What's your point?

=============================
frako
Topic: Is the evolution of modern man going to stop:

=============================

Larni
I think the question is what selection pressures are there on humans? Without birth control humans are pretty fecund and with access to medical care families get pretty large.
I'm finding it hard to think of something that is more significant than human ingenuity and use of technology in terms of successful reproduction.

============================

If you use the Peek button on the bottom right of a post you can see the coding people entered into the text box to make these quote:

quotes are easy

You just have to start the quote with this [qs] and then end it with this [/qs] and it will become:

and then end it with this

Anyways, I'm still not sure what your point is. It seems that you want to talk about the evolution of humans and what's going to end up happening?

The driver did not ride horses!

I don't know what that's supposed to mean.

Evolution, stop!

I prefer this one:

Because genetics will lead us to the grave!

You're almost making a little bit of sense, but I still don't get it. Genetics is the study of genes. Studying stuff won't lead us to the grave. Do you mean that our genetic makeup will lead us to the grave? Or that if we start messing with genes we'll end up killing ourselves off?

We still look exactly the same as the hundreds of millions of years ago.

You mean hundreds of thousands of years? But no, we don't look exactly the same.

Is what I wanted to say for researchers in the field of evolution and the origin of man, but not for Catholics.

Excuse me?

I don't think researchers are going to waste their time trying to figure out your nonsense. What with them having actual real research to do.

Moderators always keep me in check at a forum where only Proposed Topics!
In this forum, for me, has become inevitable contacts with the clergy, bypassing professionals, and so I'm given the opportunity to atone for his sins.

Who's sins? What clergy? You really aren't making any sense at all. What is it you want to talk abou?

This message is a reply to:
	Message 7 by valentin.d, posted 10-03-2012 7:00 AM		valentin.d has not replied

New Cat's Eye

Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display

(4)

Message 12 of 89 (674845)
10-03-2012 12:04 PM

Reply to: Message 11 by valentin.d
10-03-2012 11:32 AM

Re: OK, I guess we'll go for the yucks

A man walks into a psychiatrist's office wearing nothing but saran wrap. The psychiatrist says: "I can clearly see you're nuts."

This message is a reply to:
	Message 11 by valentin.d, posted 10-03-2012 11:32 AM		valentin.d has replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 13 by valentin.d, posted 10-03-2012 12:40 PM		New Cat's Eye has replied

New Cat's Eye

Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display

Message 14 of 89 (674852)
10-03-2012 12:56 PM

Reply to: Message 13 by valentin.d
10-03-2012 12:40 PM

If only you were capable of adequately iterating that truth...

This message is a reply to:
	Message 13 by valentin.d, posted 10-03-2012 12:40 PM		valentin.d has not replied

New Cat's Eye

Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display

Message 47 of 89 (675006)
10-05-2012 1:29 AM

Reply to: Message 45 by valentin.d
10-04-2012 11:04 PM

According to the fossil different organisms Geophysics try determine the origin of many minerals and rocks of the Earth's crust, but categorically rejected probability of the existence of all types of organisms and at all times with the constant change in their numbers under the influence of a cataclysms.
That is what is at the core delusion geophysicists and geochemists in the process of determining the age of fossils!

You're wrong and you're insane. Is there any way at all that I could show you that fact?

This message is a reply to:
	Message 45 by valentin.d, posted 10-04-2012 11:04 PM		valentin.d has not replied

Date format: mm-dd-yyyy

Timezone: ET (US)

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Do Nothing Button

2 online now:	LamarkNewAge, Theodoric
Newest Member:	ChatGPT
Post Volume:	Total: 916,481 Year: 3,738/9,624 Month: 609/974 Week: 222/276 Day: 62/34 Hour: 1/4