I Know That God Does Not Exist

Now you are venturing into the fallacy of argument from repetition. You can say it until the cows come home and that will not make it true. The idea of multiverses is un-evidenced and yet it is a theory in QM.
Just because something does not seem rational does not mean it does not exist.
Multiverse - WikipediaWe do not know yet. But for some reason you do. According to your reasoning you must know there is no multiverses either. Maybe you can debunk this theory based on you incredible notion of banana keys and crab chairs as well.

If you accept the premise that trillions of other universes
may exist then how do you know in some other universe crabchairs and banana keys do not exist?

You can not possibly know that because you would have to be a god to know every possibility of what exist and thus defeat your own premise. The many worlds theory is a theory in QM because it reconciles how a wave function can simultaneously be every possible event and then when observed/measured it is actualized.
Some theist believe god is this self manifested universal observer. Not saying this is correct it is but one belief.If there are trillions of other universes, some possibly with different laws of physics who are you to say what could be there despite your arguments from incredulity.

No. I was wrong in stating Multiverse is a theory. It is known as the "Many Worlds interpretation." It is a Hypothesis.Your reasoning to dismissing something based on lack of evidence makes sense but that does not mean it does not exist. It just means you have not found it yet or may never find it. You want to equivocate God to Crabchairs in order to draw your conclusions. But they are not the same thing, at least to some people. If you do not agree then you will go on to draw those same conclusions. Others, including atheist do not put crabchairs and God in the same column due to, for example, the historicity associated with the concept of God. It is as simple as that a disagreement on whether god belongs on the list of things that can be dismissed outright. *Dismissed insofar as to say one KNOWS it does not exist.Edited by 1.61803, : No reason given.

No.It is not rational to make a declaration of absolute knowledge based on tentative and incomplete information. They assume that there is not other far away land masses and this is a rational assumption.
However unless they can show on their charts that they have explored the total seas of the Earth they are speculating. Just my opinion.

Hi Stile, I suppose you can say anything you want. I can say I am Napoleon. It could turn out that the entire universe is conscious. That humans are part of this conscientiousness. a universal conscientiousness that pervades our reality.
If I want to call this God then God in this sense would exist.If panpsychism is someday found to be how reality is manifested then this would explain alot. Maybe the reason you can not point to God and say eureka is because perhaps we are intrinsically such a part of God and we can not take ourselves out of the equation.
Or it is all bollocks as Tangle would say. Edited by 1.61803, : replaced yourself to ourselves.

Lol.Just remember they scoffed at just about every crazy idea once upon a time.

Again,
you can say anything you want, but that does not make it so.
You do not know. You already previously conceded the possibility of god and then went on to say you know it does not exist. That is contradictory.

Funny. Just know AZ the biome in your gut may have opinions you thought were your own.

Einstein disagrees with you.

Your argument is fallacious. I showed you a perfect example based on your Viking scenario.
You said that it is rational for vikings to state they KNOW there is no other land masses based on all their previous expeditions that show no other land masses.
That I told you is fallacious as well despite you thinking it is fine to go about stating complete knowledge in the face of ignorance.

Even though they do not share one bit of your DNA??You may just be some eating mechanism they inhabit that facilitates them.

I agree, them bugs in your gut are not only welcome to your opinions, they may BE the thing that formulates many of them. As Spock would say, "fascinating."

I have forgotten what the point was. lol.

What??? So is there anything that we know to exist that is not rational?
Or are you saying by virtue of existing it is rational.
Because a platypus is one of the most irrational creatures I have ever seen.And when first described was met with disbelief and mockery.
But they do exist.