Larni
Member (Idle past 148 days) Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
Message 7 of 16 (677422)
10-29-2012 3:58 PM
|
Reply to: Message 6 by Omnivorous
10-29-2012 3:56 PM
|
|
Who said that.....?
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 6 by Omnivorous, posted 10-29-2012 3:56 PM | | Omnivorous has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 8 by Omnivorous, posted 10-29-2012 4:44 PM | | Larni has not replied |
|
™ Version 4.2